Khoo Oon Soo

Khoo Oon Soo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unnatural Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Workers	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Khoo Oon Soo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Khoo Oon Soo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutors	5 cases	100% of cases	Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights(Oct 2004) Public Prosecutor v Selvakumar Pillai: Theft by Servant & Admissibility of Confession(Aug 2004) Mohd Raffiq v PP: Murder Conviction Appeal - False Confessions & DNA Evidence(Jul 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Khoo Oon Soo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	42.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Khoo Oon Soo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights 19 Oct 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Oct 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by the appellant was dismissed.
2	Public Prosecutor v Selvakumar Pillai: Theft by Servant & Admissibility of Confession 25 Aug 2004 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	25 Aug 2004	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the order of acquittal was allowed.
3	Mohd Raffiq v PP: Murder Conviction Appeal - False Confessions & DNA Evidence 23 Jul 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	23 Jul 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of the appellant.
4	Annis bin Abdullah v PP: Unnatural Offences, Fellatio & Sentencing Principles 04 Mar 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	04 Mar 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against sentence allowedAppeal against sentence allowed; sentence reduced to 12 months imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Mowvalappil Ussainer v Public Prosecutor: Immigration Act - Employing Immigration Offenders 19 Jul 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Jul 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction upheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction.