Kimberley Leng

Kimberley Leng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restraint of trade and employment law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kimberley Leng has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Power of Attorney	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of fidelity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture Provision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Consent Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kimberley Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kimberley Leng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Restraint of Trade & Forfeiture of Employee Benefits(Aug 2012) Law Society v Ng Bock Hoh Dixon: Disciplinary Action for False Bill & Integrity Breach(Nov 2011) Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Enforceability of Forfeiture Provision in Incentive Plan(Nov 2011)
Providence Law Asia LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Motorola v Uzan: Revocation of Powers of Attorney & Receivership Order(Oct 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kimberley Leng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.8 parties avg	5.8	40%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kimberley Leng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Motorola v Uzan: Revocation of Powers of Attorney & Receivership Order 28 Oct 2014 COLIN ALAN COOK (Defendant)Lost	28 Oct 2014	COLIN ALAN COOK (Defendant): Order granted to revoke powers of attorneyOrder granted to revoke powers of attorney with effect from the date of the Receivership Order.
2	Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Restraint of Trade & Forfeiture of Employee Benefits 06 Aug 2012 Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	06 Aug 2012	Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
3	Law Society v Ng Bock Hoh Dixon: Disciplinary Action for False Bill & Integrity Breach 08 Nov 2011 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	08 Nov 2011	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Order for Respondent to be struck off the roll grantedThe Law Society's application was successful, and the Respondent was ordered to be struck off the roll. No order as to costs was made.
4	Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Enforceability of Forfeiture Provision in Incentive Plan 07 Nov 2011 Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 Nov 2011	Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, ruling in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler Service: Enforcement of Consent Order for Share Transfer 02 Mar 2010 Second, third, fourth, sixth, seventh, ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth defendant (Defendant, Applicant)Won	02 Mar 2010	Second, third, fourth, sixth, seventh, ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth defendant (Defendant, Applicant): Application allowedApplication to enforce consent order allowed.