Kirsten Teo

Kirsten Teo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kirsten Teo has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Service of writ out of jurisdiction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kirsten Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kirsten Teo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Broadcast Solutions v Zoom Communications: Setting Aside Order & Forum Non Conveniens(Dec 2013) Law Society v Kurubalan: Champerty, Legal Profession Act, and Professional Misconduct(Jul 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kirsten Teo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kirsten Teo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Broadcast Solutions v Zoom Communications: Setting Aside Order & Forum Non Conveniens 17 Dec 2013 Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Dec 2013	Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Zoom Communications Ltd against the dismissal of its application to set aside an order granting Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd leave to serve a writ of summons in India and to stay proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens was dismissed.
2	Law Society v Kurubalan: Champerty, Legal Profession Act, and Professional Misconduct 17 Jul 2013 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	17 Jul 2013	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantThe Law Society's application for an order to sanction the respondent was successful. The respondent was suspended from practice for six months and ordered to pay costs. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)