Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay

Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in limitation and caveats. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architects, Engineers and Surveyors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory obligations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architectural Services	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penalty Clauses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Breakpoint LLC	4 cases	67% of cases	VeriFone v Firemane: Appeal Dismissed, Summary Judgment Affirmed, Settlement Agreement Dispute(Oct 2024) MCST No 4099 v KTP Consultants: Limitation Act & Negligence in Cladding Installation(Oct 2024) Este Villa MCST v TPS Construction: Limitation Act & Striking Out in Construction Defect Case(Jun 2024)
TSMP Law Corporation	2 cases	33% of cases	Daisho Development v Architects 61: Negligent Misrepresentation in Hotel Sale(Jan 2020) BDC v BDD and BDE: Stay of Court Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Sep 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	33%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VeriFone v Firemane: Appeal Dismissed, Summary Judgment Affirmed, Settlement Agreement Dispute 20 Oct 2024 Firemane Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	20 Oct 2024	Firemane Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, summary judgment affirmed. No additional monetary amount specified for this party. Assumed USD as the original claim was in USD.
2	MCST No 4099 v KTP Consultants: Limitation Act & Negligence in Cladding Installation 08 Oct 2024 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4099 (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	08 Oct 2024	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4099 (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; striking out of KTP as a party set aside; costs awarded to the MCST. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Este Villa MCST v TPS Construction: Limitation Act & Striking Out in Construction Defect Case 09 Jun 2024 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4099 (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jun 2024	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4099 (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the third defendant, KTP Consultants Pte Ltd, was dismissed due to being time-barred. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Kok Zhen Yen v Beth Candice Wu: Caveat Removal & Wrongful Lodgment Dispute 03 May 2023 Cheong Wee Min (Claimant)Partial	03 May 2023	Cheong Wee Min (Claimant): Application allowed in partApplication allowed in part; the court ordered the removal of the Second Caveat and restrained the defendant from lodging further caveats. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Daisho Development v Architects 61: Negligent Misrepresentation in Hotel Sale 20 Jan 2020 Architects 61 Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 Jan 2020	Architects 61 Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was entered in favor of the Defendant, Architects 61 Pte Ltd. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	BDC v BDD and BDE: Stay of Court Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 21 Sep 2016 BDE (Defendant)Partial	21 Sep 2016	BDE (Defendant): Proceedings stayed in partProceedings stayed in part in favour of arbitration.