Kishan Pratap

Kishan Pratap is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kishan Pratap has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kishan Pratap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kishan Pratap has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kishan Law Chambers LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	Wingcrown Investment Pte Ltd v Mannepalli Gayatri Ram: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Property Sale Agreement(Jan 2023) Jumadi Bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Voluntariness of Statements(Nov 2021) Public Prosecutor v Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj: Importation of Cannabis and Statutory Offences(Feb 2021)
Ho Wong Law Practice LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	PP v Ramesh & Chander: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2017) Rosemawati Binti Rafdi v Buang Bin Ani: Application to Vary Consent Judgment on HDB Flat Sale(Oct 2016) Lai Hoon Woon v Lai Foong Sin: Testamentary Capacity, Constructive Trusts, Resulting Trusts(Jun 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kishan Pratap's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.8 parties avg	2.8	83%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kishan Pratap's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	724,960.84	241,653.613 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wingcrown Investment Pte Ltd v Mannepalli Gayatri Ram: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Property Sale Agreement 02 Jan 2023 Mannepalli Gayatri Ram (Defendant)Lost	02 Jan 2023	Mannepalli Gayatri Ram (Defendant): Damages assessed against DefendantDamages assessed against the Defendant in the amount of $720,960.84 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Jumadi Bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Voluntariness of Statements 29 Nov 2021 Shisham bin Abdul Rahman (Appellant)Lost	29 Nov 2021	Shisham bin Abdul Rahman (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence of death was dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj: Importation of Cannabis and Statutory Offences 23 Feb 2021 Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj (Defendant)Lost	23 Feb 2021	Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted on the charge of importing cannabis.
4	PP v Ramesh & Chander: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Nov 2017 Chander Kumar A/L Jayagaran (Defendant)Lost	13 Nov 2017	Chander Kumar A/L Jayagaran (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of possessing diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking, trafficking diamorphine by delivering it to Harun bin Idris, and trafficking diamorphine by delivering it to Ramesh A/L Perumal.
5	Rosemawati Binti Rafdi v Buang Bin Ani: Application to Vary Consent Judgment on HDB Flat Sale 09 Oct 2016 Salbiah Binti Othman (Defendant)Won	09 Oct 2016	Salbiah Binti Othman (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication dismissed with costs of $2,000 awarded to the first and second defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lai Hoon Woon v Lai Foong Sin: Testamentary Capacity, Constructive Trusts, Resulting Trusts 13 Jun 2016 Lai Foong Sin (Defendant)Lost	13 Jun 2016	Lai Foong Sin (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim Dismissed; All of the first defendant's counterclaims are dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).