KM Pillai

KM Pillai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and harassment. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

KM Pillai has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and harassment.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trespass	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	KM Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

KM Pillai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	100% of cases	Malcomson v Mehta: Harassment, Trespass, Nuisance & Injunctions(Oct 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of KM Pillai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of KM Pillai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Malcomson v Mehta: Harassment, Trespass, Nuisance & Injunctions 11 Oct 2001 Zerity (Plaintiff)Won	11 Oct 2001	Zerity (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; injunctions granted against the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).