Koh Bi'na

Koh Bi'na is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and property law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koh Bi'na has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and corporate governance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Service Agreements	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Bi'na has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koh Bi'na has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Sale in Thailand(Aug 2010) Hengxin Technology v Jiang Wei: Breach of Contract & Non-Compete Dispute(Nov 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh Bi'na's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Reserved	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Stayed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh Bi'na's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Reserved	1(33%)	33%
Stayed	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,961.65	5,961.651 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Reserved: 1 cases (50.0%) Stayed: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Sale in Thailand 02 Aug 2010 Bolliger Hans Peter (Defendant)Reserved	02 Aug 2010	Bolliger Hans Peter (Defendant): Claim against Bolliger reservedClaim against Bolliger reserved pending outcome of stay order.
2	Hengxin Technology v Jiang Wei: Breach of Contract & Non-Compete Dispute 18 Nov 2009 Qian Lirong (Defendant)Won	18 Nov 2009	Qian Lirong (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment for Qian Lirong on his counterclaim for unpaid bonuses and damages for repudiation of the service agreement. The monetary amount is the sum of $1,260.28, RMB1,101,900.49 and RMB378,574.36, converted to SGD at the prevailing exchange rate at the time of judgment. The judgment also allows the Company to setoff and deduct the actual withholding tax paid to the tax authorities on his behalf.