Koh En Da Matthew

Koh En Da Matthew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international commercial arbitration. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Condition Precedent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Arbitration Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Declaratory	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Alternative Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh En Da Matthew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koh En Da Matthew has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	CZQ v CZS: Enforceability of Arbitration Agreement & Condition Precedent(Oct 2023) Cheung Teck Cheong v LVND Investments: Ad Hoc Arbitration Agreement & Section 4(6) Arbitration Act Interpretation(Aug 2021) Republic of India v Vedanta Resources plc: Abuse of Process & Minimal Curial Intervention in Arbitration(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh En Da Matthew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	36.0 parties avg	6.0	60%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh En Da Matthew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	572,875.00	114,575.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CZQ v CZS: Enforceability of Arbitration Agreement & Condition Precedent 26 Oct 2023 CZQ (Applicant)Lost	26 Oct 2023	CZQ (Applicant): Application DismissedThe respondents' application challenging the tribunal's jurisdiction was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Cheung Teck Cheong v LVND Investments: Ad Hoc Arbitration Agreement & Section 4(6) Arbitration Act Interpretation 09 Aug 2021 LVND Investments Pte. Ltd. (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	09 Aug 2021	LVND Investments Pte. Ltd. (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and stay on the Suit lifted. The Developer to pay the costs of the appeal fixed at $50,000 (all-in) to the Appellants. The costs order below is reversed in favor of the Appellants. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Republic of India v Vedanta Resources plc: Abuse of Process & Minimal Curial Intervention in Arbitration 11 May 2021 Vedanta Resources plc (Respondent, Defendant)Won	11 May 2021	Vedanta Resources plc (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $120,000 awarded to the respondent, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Hauslab Design & Build Pte Ltd v Vinod Kumar Ramgopal Didwania: Building and Construction Dispute over Payment Claim 10 Oct 2016 Hauslab Design & Build Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	10 Oct 2016	Hauslab Design & Build Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to set aside adjudication determination dismissedDefendant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and the sum of $396,875 paid into court was released to the plaintiff. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Wang Sheng v Chen Guangfeng: Share Transfer Dispute and Summary Judgment 17 Feb 2015 Chen Guangfeng (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	17 Feb 2015	Chen Guangfeng (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $6,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).