Koh Jia Wen

Koh Jia Wen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and anti-suit injunction. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Review	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forum	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Jia Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koh Jia Wen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Sun Travels v Hilton: Enforceability of Singapore Judgment in Maldives, Examination of Judgment Debtor(Dec 2019) Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario v Law Society of Singapore: Extension of Time & Judicial Review Application(Aug 2017)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Hilton v Sun Travels: Anti-Suit Injunction for Breach of Arbitration Agreement(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh Jia Wen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh Jia Wen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sun Travels v Hilton: Enforceability of Singapore Judgment in Maldives, Examination of Judgment Debtor 23 Dec 2019 Sun Travels & Tours Pvt Ltd (Appellant)Lost	23 Dec 2019	Sun Travels & Tours Pvt Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision to allow questions regarding assets in the Maldives during examination of judgment debtor proceedings was dismissed.
2	Hilton v Sun Travels: Anti-Suit Injunction for Breach of Arbitration Agreement 13 Mar 2018 Sun Travels & Tours Pvt Ltd (Defendant)Lost	13 Mar 2018	Sun Travels & Tours Pvt Ltd (Defendant): Defendant is hereby permanently restrained from taking any steps in reliance on the ruling in the March JudgmentThe defendant is hereby permanently restrained (whether by its officers, servants, agents or any of them or otherwise howsoever) from taking any steps in reliance on the ruling in the March Judgment by the courts of the Republic of Maldives, or any decision upholding the March Judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario v Law Society of Singapore: Extension of Time & Judicial Review Application 21 Aug 2017 Law Society of Singapore (Defendant)Won	21 Aug 2017	Law Society of Singapore (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's application.