Koh Kok Wah

Koh Kok Wah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transaction at Undervalue	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kok Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koh Kok Wah has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	3 cases	43% of cases	Mercator & Noordstar NV v Velstra Pte Ltd: Winding Up & Transaction at Undervalue(Sep 2003) Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung Corp: Summary Judgment & Arbitration Stay Under Rules of Court(Aug 2003) Velstra Pte Ltd v Mercator & Noordstar NV: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Insolvency Law(Feb 2003)
Wong and Leow LLC	2 cases	29% of cases	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order(Aug 2005) Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings(Dec 2003)
Wong & Leow	2 cases	29% of cases	PT Hutan Domas Raya v Yue Xiu Enterprises: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings(Jan 2001) Yue Xiu Enterprises v PT Hutan Domas Raya: Forum Non Conveniens and Stay of Proceedings(Jun 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh Kok Wah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.7 parties avg	4.7	43%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	33.2 parties avg	3.2	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh Kok Wah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	1,000.005 cases	5
USD	5,080,000.00	5,080,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order 03 Aug 2005 Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Aug 2005	Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Order against the third defendant set asideThe court set aside the Anton Piller order against the third defendant, Impact Pacific Consultants Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings 28 Dec 2003 Samsung Corp (Appellant)Won	28 Dec 2003	Samsung Corp (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; no application for summary judgement should be brought before the stay application has been finally disposed of. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Mercator & Noordstar NV v Velstra Pte Ltd: Winding Up & Transaction at Undervalue 22 Sep 2003 Mercator & Noordstar NV (Appellant)Partial	22 Sep 2003	Mercator & Noordstar NV (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in partAppeal allowed in part relating to the substantive issue. The court declared that the plaintiff has not proven that the payment of US$5,080,000 made by Velstra to Mercator on 5 January 2000 constitutes a transaction at an undervalue within the meaning of s 98 of the Bankruptcy Act read with s 329 of the Companies Act. The appellant has not succeeded on the issue of “transaction”, it shall only be entitled to 60% of the costs, here and below. Appeal on the procedural matter dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung Corp: Summary Judgment & Arbitration Stay Under Rules of Court 14 Aug 2003 Samsung Corp (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2003	Samsung Corp (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedSamsung's appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay $5,000 in costs to CCR (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Velstra Pte Ltd v Mercator & Noordstar NV: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Insolvency Law 23 Feb 2003 Mercator & Noordstar NV (Defendant)Lost	23 Feb 2003	Mercator & Noordstar NV (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court dismissed the defendant's arguments and ordered them to return the US$5.08 million to the plaintiffs. Assumed USD, as the payment was made in USD.
6	PT Hutan Domas Raya v Yue Xiu Enterprises: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 19 Jan 2001 Linkeen Industries Ltd (Respondent)Won	19 Jan 2001	Linkeen Industries Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Yue Xiu Enterprises v PT Hutan Domas Raya: Forum Non Conveniens and Stay of Proceedings 30 Jun 2000 Another (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jun 2000	Another (Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the stay order against the first defendants.