Koh Tien Hua

Koh Tien Hua is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 51 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 24.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated expertise across 138 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	45 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 45 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	26 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 26 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Divorce	26 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 26 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	21 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	21 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	18 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	11 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	10 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	9 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice19% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice12% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Relocation of Child	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Access	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts — Express trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Registration of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Syariah Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Distribution of assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Family Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conduct of Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inter-spousal Gifts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Access Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Parent-Child Relationship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collateral Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Parenting Coordinator	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Relocation Application	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Therapist Appointment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Children	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumptions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Particular causes of action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transfer of appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trials	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Video Link	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Leave for review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Long Term Visit Pass	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Change of Name	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deed Poll	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Onus of Proof	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vacant Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegitimate Children	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ancillary Matters	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tertiary Education Expenses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Homemaker Contributions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accountancy Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vendor's Lien	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Aviation Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Creditors Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debtor and Creditor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Relocation Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Spousal Support	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Visitation Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proof of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Architects, Engineers and Surveyors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unreasonable Behaviour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation of Consent Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Tien Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koh Tien Hua has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 23 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	23 cases	45% of cases	CLS v CLT: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Gifts, and Share Transfers in Divorce(Aug 2022) VLI v VLJ: Child Custody, Care and Control, and Singapore Citizenship Application(Mar 2022) Foley v Harry Elias Partnership LLP: Taxation of Paid Legal Bills & Professional Conduct(Aug 2021)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	11 cases	22% of cases	UYK v UYJ: Child Relocation, Care and Control Dispute to UK(Jul 2020) USB v USA: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Short Marriage with Long Cohabitation(Jun 2020) VET v VEU: Guardianship of Infants Act - Same-Sex Couple, Parental Responsibility, and Welfare of Children(Feb 2020)
Harry Elias Partnership	11 cases	22% of cases	ATD v ATE: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings(May 2015) ASP v ASQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute(May 2015) Weschler Mouantri v Mouantri: Divorce Petition Dismissed Due to Prior Swedish Divorce(Apr 2009)
A. Ang, Seah & Hoe	2 cases	4% of cases	Sin Sai Peng v Soh Kim Lian Florence: Property Dispute Involving Unpaid Purchase Price and Vacant Possession(Oct 2002) Soo Nam Yuen v Keim Mineral Paints: Wrongful Dismissal Claim(Nov 2000)
A Ang, Seah and Hoe	1 cases	2% of cases	Keimfarben GmbH v Soo Nam Yuen: Assessment of Damages for Wrongful Seizure(Jul 2004)
Harry Elias LLP	1 cases	2% of cases	VLI v VLJ: Guardianship of Infants Act & Welfare of Child in Singapore(Jul 2021)
Harry Elias & Partners	1 cases	2% of cases	Teo Hoon Ping v Tan Lay Ying Angeline: Divorce Granted Due to Husband's Unreasonable Behaviour under Women's Charter(Oct 2009)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	2% of cases	Lee Pauline Bradnam v Lee Thien Terh George: Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act & Maintenance Orders(May 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh Tien Hua's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 4 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Lost	172.4 parties avg	2.4	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Partial	202.2 parties avg	2.2	39%
Won	122.5 parties avg	2.5	24%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2012	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	82.2 parties avg	2.2
2016	42.4 parties avg	2.4
2018	52.6 parties avg	2.6
2019	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh Tien Hua's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(2%)	2%
Lost	17(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(2%)	2%
Partial	20(39%)	39%
Won	12(24%)	24%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	31,019,295.22	1,000,622.4331 cases	31

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	4 22	Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2012	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	8 251	Lost: 2 cases (25.0%) Partial: 5 cases (62.5%) Won: 1 cases (12.5%)
2016	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%)
2018	5 41	Partial: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2019	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 51 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CLS v CLT: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Gifts, and Share Transfers in Divorce 04 Aug 2022 CLT (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	04 Aug 2022	CLT (Respondent, Plaintiff): Share of matrimonial assets reducedThe wife's share of the matrimonial assets was reduced due to the exclusion of the LB and J shares from the pool, resulting in a revised share of $12,712,064 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	VLI v VLJ: Child Custody, Care and Control, and Singapore Citizenship Application 09 Mar 2022 VLI (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	09 Mar 2022	VLI (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partThe Mother's appeal for sole custody and to compel the Father to apply for Singapore citizenship for the child was dismissed. The Mother was granted sole care and control of the Child.
3	Foley v Harry Elias Partnership LLP: Taxation of Paid Legal Bills & Professional Conduct 04 Aug 2021 Harry Elias Partnership LLP (Defendant)Lost	04 Aug 2021	Harry Elias Partnership LLP (Defendant): Application for summary judgment dismissedOrder for taxation under Legal Profession Act section 120 granted.
4	VLI v VLJ: Guardianship of Infants Act & Welfare of Child in Singapore 27 Jul 2021 VLI (Appellant)Lost	27 Jul 2021	VLI (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe Wife's appeal was dismissed.
5	UYK v UYJ: Child Relocation, Care and Control Dispute to UK 05 Jul 2020 UYK (Appellant)Lost	05 Jul 2020	UYK (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Father's appeal against the decision to grant care and control to the Mother and allow the child to relocate to the UK was dismissed.
6	USB v USA: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Short Marriage with Long Cohabitation 11 Jun 2020 USA (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jun 2020	USA (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partThe Wife's appeal was dismissed in part, increasing her payment to the Husband by $22,665.44 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	VET v VEU: Guardianship of Infants Act - Same-Sex Couple, Parental Responsibility, and Welfare of Children 13 Feb 2020 VET (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Feb 2020	VET (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for the defendant to be appointed guardian of the children and to share custody, care, and control was dismissed.
8	UPD v UPC: Child's Name Change Dispute Under Guardianship of Infants Act 17 Dec 2019 UPC (Respondent)Won	17 Dec 2019	UPC (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
9	UXH v UXI: Relocation of Children after Divorce - Singapore Family Law 08 Dec 2019 UXI (Respondent)Won	08 Dec 2019	UXI (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; the Mother was ordered to pay the Father the costs of the appeal inclusive of disbursements, fixed at $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	BPC v BPB: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Child Maintenance Dispute 09 Jan 2019 BPB (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	09 Jan 2019	BPB (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Husband's appeal was allowed in part; the valuation of the matrimonial asset pool was adjusted.
11	BOR v BOS: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Child Maintenance Dispute 20 Nov 2018 BOS (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	20 Nov 2018	BOS (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partThe Husband must pay a lump sum of $769,000 in maintenance for the Sons within six months. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	BON v BOQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance for University Fees 21 Oct 2018 BOQ (Respondent)Partial	21 Oct 2018	BOQ (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part in relation to the division of matrimonial assets and allowed in part in relation to the children’s maintenance (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	UDA v UDB: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Third-Party Interests in Divorce Proceedings 23 Apr 2018 UDC (Respondent)Won	23 Apr 2018	UDC (Respondent): Successful in resisting appealSuccessfully resisted the appeal.
14	UEB v UEC: Appeal on Child and Wife Maintenance under Women's Charter 13 Feb 2018 UEB (Appellant)Partial	13 Feb 2018	UEB (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against the Child's maintenance was dismissed. Arrears adjusted to $33,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	UJH v UJI: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance for Adult Sons 07 Feb 2018 UJI (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	07 Feb 2018	UJI (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal against division of assetsThe matrimonial assets valued at $5,809,359.49 are to be divided equally between parties. Husband's 50% share of the total matrimonial assets amounted to $2,904,679.49 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Yap Chai Ling v Hou Wa Yi: Recognition of Foreign Divorce Judgment & Res Judicata 04 Jul 2016 YAP SWEE JIT (Appellant)Lost	04 Jul 2016	YAP SWEE JIT (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Appellants, as executors of the husband's estate, were unsuccessful in their attempt to nullify the decree nisi.
17	TIT v TIU: Appeals on Division of Matrimonial Assets, Spousal & Child Maintenance 12 May 2016 TIT (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	12 May 2016	TIT (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Husband's appeal in DCA 140/2015 was dismissed in its entirety.
18	TME v TMF: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife & Child Maintenance Post-Divorce 11 Apr 2016 TME (Plaintiff)Partial	11 Apr 2016	TME (Plaintiff): Division of Matrimonial AssetsThe wife was allocated 42% of the known asset pool, amounting to $11,311,518 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	ATE v ATD: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce 14 Jan 2016 ATD (Respondent, Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	14 Jan 2016	ATD (Respondent, Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Wife's appeal against the division of matrimonial assets was partially allowed; the amount the Husband was to pay was increased to $63,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Yap Chai Ling v Hou Wa Yi: Setting Aside Decree Nisi Based on Prior Foreign Divorce Judgment 11 Nov 2015 YAP SWEE JIT (Appellant)Lost	11 Nov 2015	YAP SWEE JIT (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $7,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to the Wife. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	TGT v TGU: Forum Non Conveniens and Child Maintenance Under Guardianship of Infants Act 21 Oct 2015 TGT (Appellant)Won	21 Oct 2015	TGT (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and unconditional stay of proceedings in Singapore granted.
22	APE v APF: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Rights in Divorce 08 Sep 2015 APE (Appellant)Lost	08 Sep 2015	APE (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed with ClarificationAppeal dismissed, but the court clarified the legal mechanism for preserving the wife's right to future maintenance by ordering nominal maintenance of $1 per year.
23	ANJ v ANK: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance After Divorce 06 Jul 2015 ANK (Respondent)Partial	06 Jul 2015	ANK (Respondent): Orders VariedThe ratio for the division of matrimonial assets was readjusted to 50:50.
24	ATD v ATE: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings 14 May 2015 ATD (Plaintiff)Partial	14 May 2015	ATD (Plaintiff): Orders made in her favorThe court ordered the net sale proceeds of No. 950 Dunearn Road #05-01 Gardenvista, Singapore 589474 (“the matrimonial home”) in the sum of $186,097.51 were to be divided equally between the parties; The Defendant was to pay the Plaintiff a sum of $36,000.00; The parties were to retain all other assets in their respective names and possession; The Defendant was to pay the Plaintiff maintenance of $1 per month for herself; Parties were to bear their own respective costs of the proceedings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	TBC v TBD: Illegitimate Child Maintenance - Duty of Father under Women's Charter 12 May 2015 TBD (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	12 May 2015	TBD (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partThe Respondent’s appeal on his liability to pay maintenance for the child was dismissed, but the amount of maintenance that he is to pay was reduced to $720 per month (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	ASP v ASQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 04 May 2015 ASQ (Defendant)Partial	04 May 2015	ASQ (Defendant): Division of matrimonial assets ordered; maintenance for daughter ordered; no maintenance for wife ordered; appealed.Orders made for division of matrimonial assets and child maintenance. No maintenance ordered for the wife. Appealed against orders in respect of the apartments and maintenance. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
27	APE v APF: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody, and Maintenance Dispute 19 Jan 2015 APE (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Jan 2015	APE (Plaintiff): Joint custody of child granted; care and control to Plaintiff; Matrimonial home divided 70:30 in Plaintiff's favorJoint custody of child granted; care and control to Plaintiff; Matrimonial home divided 70:30 in Plaintiff's favor (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	ANT v ANU: Child Custody Dispute and Forum Non Conveniens in International Family Law 06 Nov 2014 ANU (Respondent)Partial	06 Nov 2014	ANU (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed regarding the stay of application for the return of children but allowed regarding the stay of application for a Personal Protection Order.
29	Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Tee: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance 10 Apr 2014 Tan Chye Tee (Respondent)Partial	10 Apr 2014	Tan Chye Tee (Respondent): Partial WinThe wife was awarded 55% of the net sale proceeds of the Loyang View property, amounting to $520,035.13 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). She is also entitled to lump sum maintenance of $70,000.
30	Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Tee: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Child Maintenance 26 Sep 2013 Tan Chye Tee (Defendant, Respondent)Won	26 Sep 2013	Tan Chye Tee (Defendant, Respondent): Orders made in her favorOrders made for division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for the Wife and children. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	BDA v BDB: Forum Non Conveniens in Maintenance Application under Women's Charter 17 Oct 2012 BDA (Appellant)Won	17 Oct 2012	BDA (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Wife was awarded costs here and below (to be taxed, if not agreed), with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	ATT v ATS: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance After Divorce 02 Apr 2012 ATS (Respondent)Lost	02 Apr 2012	ATS (Respondent): Division of assets adjustedThe wife's share of the three immovable properties as ordered by the Judge was excessive and should be reduced.
33	Hou Wa Yi v Yap Kiat Cheong: Appeal on Decree Nisi After Death of Party Under Women's Charter 26 Mar 2012 Yap Kiat Cheong (Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2012	Yap Kiat Cheong (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed.
34	ATS v ATT: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Post-Divorce 21 Sep 2011 ATS (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Sep 2011	ATS (Plaintiff): Orders on maintenance for the Wife and children, and the division of the matrimonial assets were made.The Husband is to pay the Wife a sum of $8,400 a month as maintenance for herself and the Children. The breakdown of this sum is $2,500 for the Wife’s personal expenses, $900 for the Children’s personal expenses and $5,000 for the household expenses. In addition, the Husband shall pay the Wife, and not on a reimbursement basis, the Children’s expenses relating to their education, insurance policies and weekly pocket money. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	ZO v ZP: Appeals on Custody, Maintenance, and Division of Matrimonial Assets 24 May 2011 ZO (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	24 May 2011	ZO (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding custody and division of matrimonial assets. The husband was ordered to pay the wife $119,353.36, being 50 per cent of the remaining value of matrimonial assets that are to be distributed to the parties. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Ng Irene v Tan Meng Heng Robin: Dispute over Variation of Divorce Order Regarding Matrimonial Asset Division 22 May 2011 Ng Irene (Plaintiff)Won	22 May 2011	Ng Irene (Plaintiff): Application GrantedApplication to vary the Order of Court of 9 February 2010 granted to give effect to the proposed swap that she accepted.
37	Lee Chi Lena v Chien Chuen Chi Jeffrey: Injunction Against Property Disposal in Divorce Proceedings 11 Apr 2011 Chien Chuen Chi Jeffrey (Defendant, Respondent)Won	11 Apr 2011	Chien Chuen Chi Jeffrey (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs against the Plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
38	Teo Hoon Ping v Tan Lay Ying Angeline: Divorce Granted Due to Husband's Unreasonable Behaviour under Women's Charter 27 Oct 2009 Teo Hoon Ping (Appellant)Lost	27 Oct 2009	Teo Hoon Ping (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
39	Weschler Mouantri v Mouantri: Divorce Petition Dismissed Due to Prior Swedish Divorce 06 Apr 2009 Soo Lai Lin (Co-respondent)Won	06 Apr 2009	Soo Lai Lin (Co-respondent): Petition DismissedDivorce petition dismissed. Assumed currency is Singapore Dollar (SGD) as the judgment originates from Singapore.
40	QU v QV: Contempt of Court & Civil Procedure - Order for Compliance Timeframe 09 Mar 2008 QU (Appellant)Won	09 Mar 2008	QU (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Committal Order was set aside. Parties to pay their own costs in this appeal and in the High Court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	VH v VI: Stay of Divorce Proceedings & Anti-Suit Injunction in Concurrent Singapore & Swedish Divorce Cases 16 Dec 2007 B (Co-Respondent)Neutral	16 Dec 2007	B (Co-Respondent): NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for the co-respondent.
42	QU v QV: Contempt of Court for Failure to Comply with Ancillary Order in Divorce Proceedings 29 Aug 2007 QU (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	29 Aug 2007	QU (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $3,000 to be paid by the wife to the husband, such costs to be paid by means of the security deposit furnished by the wife for this appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
43	Ong Boon Huat Samuel v Chan Mei Lan Kristine: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets 07 Aug 2006 Chan Mei Lan Kristine (Respondent)Lost	07 Aug 2006	Chan Mei Lan Kristine (Respondent): Application dismissedWife’s application to strike out the appeal was dismissed with costs.
44	United Overseas Bank v Chia Kin Tuck: Priority Dispute Between Mortgagee and Judgment Creditor 24 May 2006 Chia Kin Tuck (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	24 May 2006	Chia Kin Tuck (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the assistant registrar was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
45	Lee Pauline Bradnam v Lee Thien Terh George: Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act & Maintenance Orders 17 May 2006 Lee Thien Terh George (Defendant)Won	17 May 2006	Lee Thien Terh George (Defendant): Order Not RegisteredThe court decided that the periodic maintenance order should not be registered under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act.
46	Leong Choon Kum v Chia Kin Tuck: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Contributions 18 Apr 2005 Chia Kin Tuck (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	18 Apr 2005	Chia Kin Tuck (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partThe husband's appeal against the division of matrimonial assets was dismissed in part, requiring him to pay the wife a share of the property, cash assets, and reimbursement for rent. The total amount payable to the wife was $1,538,858.80 (Singapore Dollars).
47	Re Estate of Chong Siew Kum: Resulting Trusts, Presumption of Advancement & Limitation Act 27 Feb 2005 Chia Kin Tuck (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2005	Chia Kin Tuck (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedThe plaintiff's claims that the Ringwood and Balestier properties were held in trust for the estate of Chong Siew Kum were dismissed.
48	Chia Kin Tuck v Leong Choon Kum: Claim for Money Had and Received Dispute 03 Jan 2005 Chia Kin Tuck (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	03 Jan 2005	Chia Kin Tuck (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeals dismissed; judgment variedAppeals dismissed; judgment varied to order the second defendant to return $1 million with interest to the plaintiff's solicitors, pending resolution of beneficial ownership. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
49	Keimfarben GmbH v Soo Nam Yuen: Assessment of Damages for Wrongful Seizure 06 Jul 2004 Soo Nam Yuen (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	06 Jul 2004	Soo Nam Yuen (Defendant, Respondent): Partial JudgmentAwarded $5,000 as damages. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
50	Sin Sai Peng v Soh Kim Lian Florence: Property Dispute Involving Unpaid Purchase Price and Vacant Possession 09 Oct 2002 Soh Kim Lian Florence (Defendant)Dismissed	09 Oct 2002	Soh Kim Lian Florence (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim for loss of rental dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
51	Soo Nam Yuen v Keim Mineral Paints: Wrongful Dismissal Claim 15 Nov 2000 Soo Nam Yuen (Plaintiff)Won	15 Nov 2000	Soo Nam Yuen (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment with costs is granted to the plaintiff against the 1st defendants for the wrongful dismissal. The damages are to be assessed. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.