Krishnan Nadarajan

Krishnan Nadarajan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in evidence and family law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in evidence and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Visitation Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Effective Cause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Abuse	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Legitimacy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale and Leaseback	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Marketing Agent	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Krishnan Nadarajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Krishnan Nadarajan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Aequitas Law LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	WX v WW: Child Maintenance, Presumption of Legitimacy, and Biological Father's Obligations(Mar 2009) Chong Pit Khai v Public Prosecutor: Drink-Driving, Road Traffic Act & Sentencing Appeal(Mar 2009)
Tan, Lim & Wong	2 cases	40% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Ismil bin Kadar: Murder, Robbery, and Common Intention(Apr 2009) Colliers International v Senkee Logistics: Agency Agreement & Commission Dispute(Jan 2007)
Robert Wang and Woo LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	CX v CY: Child Custody and Access Dispute Between Parents in Different Jurisdictions(Jul 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Krishnan Nadarajan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	32.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Krishnan Nadarajan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Ismil bin Kadar: Murder, Robbery, and Common Intention 06 Apr 2009 Ismil bin Kadar (Defendant)Neutral	06 Apr 2009	Ismil bin Kadar (Defendant): Judgment reservedThe court reserved judgment.
2	WX v WW: Child Maintenance, Presumption of Legitimacy, and Biological Father's Obligations 24 Mar 2009 WW (Respondent)Won	24 Mar 2009	WW (Respondent): Maintenance Order UpheldThe District Judge's order for the appellant to pay maintenance for the child was upheld.
3	Chong Pit Khai v Public Prosecutor: Drink-Driving, Road Traffic Act & Sentencing Appeal 23 Mar 2009 Chong Pit Khai (Appellant)Won	23 Mar 2009	Chong Pit Khai (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the sentence was allowed. The custodial sentence was set aside and a fine of $5,000 was imposed.
4	Colliers International v Senkee Logistics: Agency Agreement & Commission Dispute 31 Jan 2007 Colliers International (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Jan 2007	Colliers International (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for commission was dismissed as the court found no contractual relationship and that the plaintiff was not the effective cause of the sale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	CX v CY: Child Custody and Access Dispute Between Parents in Different Jurisdictions 18 Jul 2005 CY (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2005	CY (Respondent): Orders UpheldJoint custody and overseas access orders upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.