Kristy Tan Ruyan

Kristy Tan Ruyan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in statutory interpretation and sentencing. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and statutory interpretation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kristy Tan Ruyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kristy Tan Ruyan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Title & Final Payment(Jul 2011) Lim Eng Hock Peter v Lin Jian Wei: Defamation Claim Costs Assessment(Aug 2010)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CRH: Attempted Aggravated Rape & Mandatory Minimum Sentencing(Feb 2024) Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kristy Tan Ruyan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kristy Tan Ruyan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,300,000.00	650,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v CRH: Attempted Aggravated Rape & Mandatory Minimum Sentencing 04 Feb 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Feb 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): SuccessfulAccused sentenced to a global sentence of 13 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
2	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression 27 Feb 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy.
3	Ng Teck Sim Colin v Hat Holdings: Dispute over Villa 2 Title & Final Payment 14 Jul 2011 Bolliger Hans Peter (Respondent)Lost	14 Jul 2011	Bolliger Hans Peter (Respondent): Cross-appeal dismissedThe defendants' cross-appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay costs of the appeals and of the trial below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Lim Eng Hock Peter v Lin Jian Wei: Defamation Claim Costs Assessment 25 Aug 2010 Another (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2010	Another (Defendant): Costs to be borneDefendants to bear the costs of the Plaintiff for the trial on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.