Krystle Chiang

Krystle Chiang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sexual offences. Their track record shows a 78.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Krystle Chiang has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	8 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	8 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Reckless Driving	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
House-breaking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug-related Sexual Assault	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Impersonating a police officer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Driving without a valid license	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Krystle Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Krystle Chiang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	9 cases	100% of cases	Agustinus Hadi v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving under Road Traffic Act(Oct 2024) Muhammad Anddy Faizul v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Sexual Offences(Nov 2020) Hartung v Public Prosecutor: Promoting Child Sex Tours & Distribution of Information(Nov 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Krystle Chiang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%
Won	72.0 parties avg	2.0	78%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Krystle Chiang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Won	7(78%)	78%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Agustinus Hadi v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving under Road Traffic Act 15 Oct 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Oct 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
2	Muhammad Anddy Faizul v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Sexual Offences 15 Nov 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Nov 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
3	Hartung v Public Prosecutor: Promoting Child Sex Tours & Distribution of Information 12 Nov 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Nov 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
4	Aw Soy Tee v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Using Criminal Force on Public Servant 02 Jun 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Jun 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the District Judge's sentence was dismissed, upholding the original sentence.
5	Public Prosecutor v BAC: Culpable Homicide and Mental Depression in Child's Death 30 Mar 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Mar 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of 5 years imprisonment imposedThe accused was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.
6	PP v Syed Suhail: Trafficking Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Jan 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt on the trafficking charge.
7	Public Prosecutor v Azuar Bin Ahamad: Rape, Sexual Assault, and Use of Stupefying Drugs 24 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and sentenced.
8	Public Prosecutor v Lee Han Fong Lyon: Sentencing Appeal for Impersonating a Police Officer and Drug Consumption 29 Apr 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence of probation was dismissed.
9	Ng Chun Hian v PP: Kleptomania, House-Breaking, and Sentencing Considerations 18 Feb 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	18 Feb 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and case remitted to the District Judge for a Newton hearing.