Kua Lay Theng

Kua Lay Theng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and performance bond. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cause of action estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Calderbank Offer	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kua Lay Theng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kua Lay Theng has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Res Judicata & Striking Out in Construction Dispute(Jun 2020) CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Appeal on Arbitral Award under Arbitration Act(Apr 2020) Asplenium Land v Lam Chye Shing: Legal Professional Privilege for In-House Counsel(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kua Lay Theng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	45.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kua Lay Theng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Res Judicata & Striking Out in Construction Dispute 28 Jun 2020 Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2020	Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims in conspiracy struck outPlaintiff's claims in conspiracy against the first defendant are struck out in their totality.
2	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Appeal on Arbitral Award under Arbitration Act 26 Apr 2020 Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	26 Apr 2020	Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe court dismissed CKR's application for leave to appeal, upholding the arbitral award in favor of Asplenium.
3	Asplenium Land v Lam Chye Shing: Legal Professional Privilege for In-House Counsel 21 Feb 2019 Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	21 Feb 2019	Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication allowed; declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted in respect of the Item 3 and Item 4 documents. Costs of the application and reasonable disbursements to be paid by CKR to Asplenium, the quantum of which was to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Enforceability of Clause Restricting Performance Bond Calls Based on Unconscionability 21 Apr 2015 Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Won	21 Apr 2015	Asplenium Land Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAsplenium's appeal against the Judge’s decision was allowed.