Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan

Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Complicity	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fundamental liberties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal motions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Freedom of assembly	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Miya Manik: Complicity, Common Intention, and Murder Sentencing(Nov 2022) Miya Manik v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motions, Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process(Sep 2021) Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Public Order Act s 16(1)(a) and Freedom of Assembly(Nov 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kumaresan s/o Gohulabalan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Miya Manik: Complicity, Common Intention, and Murder Sentencing 10 Nov 2022 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent, Applicant)Lost	10 Nov 2022	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent, Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal on the Common Intention Charge was dismissed.
2	Miya Manik v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motions, Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process 21 Sep 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant)Neutral	21 Sep 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant): No Order MadeNo order was made on Criminal Motion No 23 of 2021.
3	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Public Order Act s 16(1)(a) and Freedom of Assembly 05 Nov 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Nov 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Reference UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the constitutionality of s 16(1)(a) of the Public Order Act.
4	Public Prosecutor v Miya Manik: Murder Charge Reduced to Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapon 10 Aug 2020 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Partial	10 Aug 2020	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): PartialMurder charge reduced to grievous hurt with a dangerous weapon.