Kwang Jia Min

Kwang Jia Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prospective Overruling	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deficient Legal Services	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Agencies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Impossible attempt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kwang Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kwang Jia Min has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	83% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance(Nov 2022) Public Prosecutor v Gunalan Goval: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2022) Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Affandi: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2021)
Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office	1 cases	17% of cases	Lai Chung Wing v Nusantara Energy: Winding Up Order for Suspended Business(Nov 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kwang Jia Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Unknown	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kwang Jia Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Unknown	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lai Chung Wing v Nusantara Energy: Winding Up Order for Suspended Business 05 Nov 2024 Official Receiver (Non-party)Neutral	05 Nov 2024	Official Receiver (Non-party): NeutralThe Official Receiver was a non-party to the proceedings.
2	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance 15 Nov 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)	15 Nov 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): -
3	Public Prosecutor v Gunalan Goval: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Apr 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Apr 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of the charge.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Affandi: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Jun 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Jun 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against Mohamed Affandi, who was sentenced to 28 years' imprisonment.
5	International Placements (S) Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Statutory Interpretation of Employment Agencies Act 05 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal by International Placements (S) Pte Ltd was dismissed.
6	Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor: Impossible Attempt, Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Feb 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Original Conviction OverturnedThe Court of Appeal overturned the original conviction.