L Devadason

L Devadason is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and easements. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

L Devadason has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Land disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letter of Intent	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Customer Confidentiality	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forged document	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	L Devadason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

L Devadason has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	20% of cases	Lian Kok Hong v Lee Choi Kheong: Easement Dispute over Access Road Construction(Jan 2009)
LegalStandard LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Liu Yanzhe v Tan Eu Jin: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Autostyle Investment(Mar 2019)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Falmac Limited v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and s160 Companies Act(May 2013)
Harpal Mahtani Partnership	1 cases	20% of cases	Computer Interface Singapore Ltd v Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd: Contract Formation Dispute(Oct 2003)
Mahtani & Co	1 cases	20% of cases	MeesPierson NV v Bay Pacific: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Health Certificate(Aug 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of L Devadason's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Withdrawn	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	54.7 parties avg	4.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of L Devadason's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Withdrawn	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,339,033.25	446,344.423 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Withdrawn: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Liu Yanzhe v Tan Eu Jin: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Autostyle Investment 20 Mar 2019 Lim Hung Kok (Defendant)Won	20 Mar 2019	Lim Hung Kok (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantPlaintiffs’ claim against the fourth defendant, Lim Hung Kok, is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Falmac Limited v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and s160 Companies Act 22 May 2013 Cheng Ji Lai Charlie (Defendant)Won	22 May 2013	Cheng Ji Lai Charlie (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedJudgment in favor of D2 in the total sum of $1,339,033.25 together with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the Writ to payment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lian Kok Hong v Lee Choi Kheong: Easement Dispute over Access Road Construction 13 Jan 2009 Lee Sherwin (Defendant)Won	13 Jan 2009	Lee Sherwin (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for access to the easement through the plaintiff's land was allowed.
4	Computer Interface Singapore Ltd v Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd: Contract Formation Dispute 14 Oct 2003 Computer Interface Singapore Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Oct 2003	Computer Interface Singapore Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJudgment for the Plaintiff in respect of the wrongful termination of its services; assessment of damages arising from the said termination form the subject matter of a separate hearing to be conducted by the Registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
5	MeesPierson NV v Bay Pacific: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Health Certificate 13 Aug 2000 Third defendant (Defendant)Withdrawn	13 Aug 2000	Third defendant (Defendant): Claim WithdrawnMP Bank applied for leave to withdraw their claim against the third defendant, which was granted. MP Bank was ordered to pay costs to the third defendant on an indemnity basis.