L F Violet Netto

L F Violet Netto is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in limitation and personal liability of solicitor for costs. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

L F Violet Netto has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal liability of solicitor for costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Doctrine of laches	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prison Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	L F Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

L F Violet Netto has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
L F Violet Netto	2 cases	50% of cases	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Abuse of Process & Mental Capacity in Death Penalty Case(Mar 2022) Re Estate of Tan Kow Quee: Doctrine of Laches & Limitation Act in Estate Claims(Feb 2007)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	25% of cases	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Personal Costs Orders Against Defence Counsel(May 2022)
M/s L F Violet Netto	1 cases	25% of cases	Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General: Application for Prohibiting Order and Declarations Regarding Caning(Jul 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of L F Violet Netto's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	75%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of L F Violet Netto's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Personal Costs Orders Against Defence Counsel 25 May 2022 Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	25 May 2022	Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondent. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Abuse of Process & Mental Capacity in Death Penalty Case 28 Mar 2022 Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Appellant)Lost	28 Mar 2022	Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed.
3	Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General: Application for Prohibiting Order and Declarations Regarding Caning 07 Jul 2015 Yong Vui Kong (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Jul 2015	Yong Vui Kong (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for a prohibiting order and declarations was dismissed.
4	Re Estate of Tan Kow Quee: Doctrine of Laches & Limitation Act in Estate Claims 11 Feb 2007 Tan Khim Heng (Defendant)Won	11 Feb 2007	Tan Khim Heng (Defendant): WonAction dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.