L Kuppanchetti

L Kuppanchetti is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and gifts law. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Error	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money had and received	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Habitual Residence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	L Kuppanchetti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

L Kuppanchetti has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Alban Tay Mahtani & de Silva	3 cases	60% of cases	Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Dispute over Gift of Moneys in Bank Accounts(Sep 2003) Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Amendment of Defence & Illegality in Trust Claim(Apr 2003) Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Forum Non Conveniens & Trust over Joint Accounts(Aug 2002)
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Lee Mei-Chih v Chang Kuo-Yuan: Divorce Jurisdiction & Habitual Residence(Sep 2012)
Alban Tay Mahtani & de Silva LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Sunny Daisy Ltd v WBG Network: Amendment of Writ and Setting Aside Judgment(Jul 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of L Kuppanchetti's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	42.7 parties avg	2.7	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of L Kuppanchetti's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	2,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Mei-Chih v Chang Kuo-Yuan: Divorce Jurisdiction & Habitual Residence 02 Sep 2012 Chang Kuo-Yuan (Defendant, Respondent)Won	02 Sep 2012	Chang Kuo-Yuan (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; defendant successfully argued lack of jurisdiction. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Sunny Daisy Ltd v WBG Network: Amendment of Writ and Setting Aside Judgment 14 Jul 2008 Sunny Daisy Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	14 Jul 2008	Sunny Daisy Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application to amend writ allowedThe court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the writ of summons to correct the place of incorporation.
3	Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Dispute over Gift of Moneys in Bank Accounts 23 Sep 2003 Choo Lee Chin (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Sep 2003	Choo Lee Chin (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed with costs.
4	Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Amendment of Defence & Illegality in Trust Claim 29 Apr 2003 Choo Lee Chin (Plaintiff)Won	29 Apr 2003	Choo Lee Chin (Plaintiff): Appeal allowedDefendant's appeal dismissed with costs of $4,000 to the Plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Forum Non Conveniens & Trust over Joint Accounts 27 Aug 2002 Choo Lee Chin (Respondent)Won	27 Aug 2002	Choo Lee Chin (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal by Won Siok Wan against the decision refusing a stay of the action was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).