Lai Tze Chang Stanley

Lai Tze Chang Stanley is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and copyrights. Their track record shows a 9.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 27% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patent Revocation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administration of Insolvent Estates	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adduction of Further Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lai Tze Chang Stanley has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lai Tze Chang Stanley has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	10 cases	91% of cases	Hin Leong Trading v Lim Oon Kuin: Disposition of Property under Insolvency Act(Oct 2024) General Hotel Management v The Wave Studio: Copyright Ownership & Offer to Settle(Apr 2023) I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting: Copyright Infringement and Breach of Confidence Dispute(Apr 2020)
Lee & Lee	1 cases	9% of cases	PT Hutan Domas Raya v Yue Xiu Enterprises: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings(Jan 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lai Tze Chang Stanley's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (27%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	83.4 parties avg	3.4	73%
Partial	25.0 parties avg	5.0	18%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	9%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lai Tze Chang Stanley's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(73%)	73%
Partial	2(18%)	18%
Won	1(9%)	9%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,500.00	916.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hin Leong Trading v Lim Oon Kuin: Disposition of Property under Insolvency Act 24 Oct 2024 Hiew Wen Li (Non-party)Lost	24 Oct 2024	Hiew Wen Li (Non-party): Applications dismissedThe applications concerning the disposition of property were dismissed.
2	General Hotel Management v The Wave Studio: Copyright Ownership & Offer to Settle 03 Apr 2023 General Hotel Management, Ltd (Appellant)Partial	03 Apr 2023	General Hotel Management, Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Costs order revised downwards from $300,000 plus disbursements to $200,000 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting: Copyright Infringement and Breach of Confidence Dispute 05 Apr 2020 Li Yong (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	05 Apr 2020	Li Yong (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partThe appellant succeeded in its claims for breach of confidence and have its injury vindicated by a measure of equitable damages, to be assessed.
4	Global Tobacco v Jamal: Trade Mark Invalidity for Cigarette Products 28 Sep 2015 Global Tobacco Manufacturers (International) Sdn Bhd (Appellant)Lost	28 Sep 2015	Global Tobacco Manufacturers (International) Sdn Bhd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal and proceedings below to be taxed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence 27 Dec 2010 Martek Biosciences Corp (Appellant)Lost	27 Dec 2010	Martek Biosciences Corp (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Pioneers & Leaders v Asia Pacific: Copyright Infringement & Passing Off in Horse-Racing Publication 29 Jul 2010 Asia Pacific Publishing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jul 2010	Asia Pacific Publishing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant’s counterclaim being completely unmeritorious is dismissed with costs which, as with the costs of the plaintiff’s claim, shall be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence 02 May 2010 Martek Biosciences Corp (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	02 May 2010	Martek Biosciences Corp (Applicant, Appellant): Application dismissed with costsApplication to adduce further evidence was dismissed with costs of $5,500 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Applicant to the Respondents as costs of this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trademark Registration Refusal Appeal 04 Aug 2009 Mobil Petroleum Company, Inc (Appellant)Lost	04 Aug 2009	Mobil Petroleum Company, Inc (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the registration of the 'MOBIS' trademark was dismissed.
9	Inphosoft Pte Ltd v Ho Jin Kiat: Copyright Infringement & Search Order Dispute 29 Jun 2009 Foo Guowei Derek (Other)Won	29 Jun 2009	Foo Guowei Derek (Other): Application for return of black box allowedThe proposed intervener's application to be added as a party to Summons 4795 and for a return of the black box seized was allowed.
10	Mobil Petroleum v Hyundai Mobis: Trade Mark Registration Refusal - Bad Faith & Likelihood of Confusion 29 Jun 2008 Mobil Petroleum Co, Inc (Appellant)Lost	29 Jun 2008	Mobil Petroleum Co, Inc (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
11	PT Hutan Domas Raya v Yue Xiu Enterprises: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 19 Jan 2001 PT Hutan Domas Raya (Appellant)Lost	19 Jan 2001	PT Hutan Domas Raya (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).