Lai Wei Kang Louis

Lai Wei Kang Louis is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in winding up and evidence law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Winding Up	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Proof of Debt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Set-off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lai Wei Kang Louis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lai Wei Kang Louis has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Kyen Resources v Feima International: Liquidators' Crossclaims & Proof of Debt(Mar 2024) Envy Asset Management v Lau Lee Sheng: Striking Out Pleadings & Amendment Application(Feb 2024) Tan Tien Sek v Tan Tien Sai: Oral Contract & Parol Evidence Rule Dispute(Mar 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lai Wei Kang Louis's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.5
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	39.0 parties avg	9.0	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	210.7 parties avg	10.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lai Wei Kang Louis's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kyen Resources v Feima International: Liquidators' Crossclaims & Proof of Debt 04 Mar 2024 Goh Thien Phong (Appellant)Lost	04 Mar 2024	Goh Thien Phong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Goh Thien Phong, as liquidator, was not successful in challenging the decision to allow Feima International's proof of debt.
2	Envy Asset Management v Lau Lee Sheng: Striking Out Pleadings & Amendment Application 07 Feb 2024 Toh Ai Ling (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	07 Feb 2024	Toh Ai Ling (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by the first and second defendants against the claimants was dismissed.
3	Tan Tien Sek v Tan Tien Sai: Oral Contract & Parol Evidence Rule Dispute 30 Mar 2023 Tan Tien Sai (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2023	Tan Tien Sai (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Feima International v Kyen Resources: Proof of Debt in Liquidation Dispute 04 Dec 2022 Goh Thien Phong (Defendant)Lost	04 Dec 2022	Goh Thien Phong (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedKyen's counterclaim for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.