Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando

Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Expert Determination	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Holborn Law LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Lim Siew Fern v Tan Beng Yong: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute(Nov 2023) Powercom Yuraku v Sunpower Semiconductor: Setting Aside Default Judgment in Singapore High Court(Aug 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lakshanthi Kumari Fernando's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	30,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Siew Fern v Tan Beng Yong: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute 16 Nov 2023 Agile Accomm Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	16 Nov 2023	Agile Accomm Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application Opposed SuccessfullySuccessfully opposed the plaintiff's application, with costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Powercom Yuraku v Sunpower Semiconductor: Setting Aside Default Judgment in Singapore High Court 31 Aug 2022 Vijaykumar Kishinchand Amesur (Defendant)Neutral	31 Aug 2022	Vijaykumar Kishinchand Amesur (Defendant): No specific outcomeNo specific outcome was mentioned for the fourth defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.