Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan

Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages assessment and discovery of documents. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in damages assessment and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Damages Assessment	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Specific discovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joyce A. Tan & Partners LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Appeal(Nov 2024) The Resolution and Collection Corp v Tsuneji Kawabe: Specific Discovery Dispute(Oct 2024) TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Clarification(Jun 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	36.3 parties avg	6.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	45.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lakshmanan s/o Anbarazan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
JPY	773,884,792.00	773,884,792.001 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Appeal 21 Nov 2024 ASMPT Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant)Partial	21 Nov 2024	ASMPT Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partASMPT's appeal was allowed in part regarding the failure to account for certain costs under the category of “general additional costs of sales”. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	The Resolution and Collection Corp v Tsuneji Kawabe: Specific Discovery Dispute 10 Oct 2024 The Resolution and Collection Corporation (formerly known as Housing Loan Administration Corporation) (Plaintiff)Partial	10 Oct 2024	The Resolution and Collection Corporation (formerly known as Housing Loan Administration Corporation) (Plaintiff): Order for production of unredacted documentsOrder for Specified Defendants to produce the unredacted version of the Required Documents within five days of this Judgment being published. Costs thrown away in favour of the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	TOWA Corp v ASMPT: Patent Infringement Damages Assessment Clarification 26 Jun 2024 ASMPT Limited (Defendant)Lost	26 Jun 2024	ASMPT Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDamages awarded against the defendant in the sum of ¥386,942,396, excluding interests and costs. Assumed JPY as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	The Resolution and Collection Corp v Tsuneji Kawabe: Discovery of Documents in Estate Asset Dispute 07 Mar 2024 The Resolution and Collection Corporation (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Mar 2024	The Resolution and Collection Corporation (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe plaintiff's request for discovery was partially granted.