Lalita Chelliah

Lalita Chelliah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal profession act and admission to the bar. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in legal profession act and disciplinary proceedings.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Loss of future earnings	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Traffic Collision	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lalita Chelliah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lalita Chelliah has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	33% of cases	Re CTA: Applicants' Admission to the Bar Adjourned Due to Cheating on Bar Exam(Apr 2022)
Mathew Chew & Chelliah	1 cases	33% of cases	Re Monisha Devaraj and other matters: Rescission of Redaction and Sealing Orders for Advocate and Solicitor Admissions(Apr 2022)
Rayney Wong & Eric Ng	1 cases	33% of cases	Choong Peng Kong v Koh Hong Son: Damages for Personal Injuries & Loss of Future Earnings(Jun 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lalita Chelliah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.9
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	33%
Other	19.0 parties avg	9.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	28.5 parties avg	8.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lalita Chelliah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Other	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Other: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Monisha Devaraj and other matters: Rescission of Redaction and Sealing Orders for Advocate and Solicitor Admissions 26 Apr 2022 Wong Choong Yoong, Lionel (Applicant)Neutral	26 Apr 2022	Wong Choong Yoong, Lionel (Applicant): NeutralAttorney-General’s application to rescind the redaction and sealing orders allowed.
2	Re CTA: Applicants' Admission to the Bar Adjourned Due to Cheating on Bar Exam 17 Apr 2022 CTF (Applicant)Other	17 Apr 2022	CTF (Applicant): Application adjourned for six monthsApplication for admission to the bar was adjourned for six months.
3	Choong Peng Kong v Koh Hong Son: Damages for Personal Injuries & Loss of Future Earnings 22 Jun 2003 Choong Peng Kong (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	22 Jun 2003	Choong Peng Kong (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal for higher damages was dismissed. The court ordered the claimant to pay costs of $2,500 of the appeals to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).