Lam Chung Nian

Lam Chung Nian is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and abuse of process.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Transnational issue estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Innocent Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Chung Nian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lam Chung Nian has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	2 cases	67% of cases	Future Enterprises v McDonald's: Likelihood of Confusion Between 'MacCoffee' and 'McCAFÉ' Trademarks(Sep 2006) Richemont International SA v Da Vinci Collections: Trade Mark Infringement & Validity(Aug 2006)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA: Transnational Issue Estoppel & Foreign Judgments(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lam Chung Nian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lam Chung Nian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	60,000.00	30,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA: Transnational Issue Estoppel & Foreign Judgments 25 Feb 2021 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) (Appellant)Lost	25 Feb 2021	Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $50,000 awarded to the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Future Enterprises v McDonald's: Likelihood of Confusion Between 'MacCoffee' and 'McCAFÉ' Trademarks 28 Sep 2006 Future Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	28 Sep 2006	Future Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $10,000 to be paid to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Richemont International SA v Da Vinci Collections: Trade Mark Infringement & Validity 21 Aug 2006 Da Vinci Collections Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Aug 2006	Da Vinci Collections Pte Ltd (Defendant): Injunction GrantedInjunction granted against the defendant, its officers, servants, and agents, restraining them from advertising its watches using the word mark 'DA VINCI'. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.