Lam Jianhao Mark

Lam Jianhao Mark is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in presumption of advancement and contract law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and presumption of advancement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stakeholding	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lam Jianhao Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lam Jianhao Mark has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Central Chambers Law Corporation	4 cases	100% of cases	Ranjit Singh v Harisankar Singh: Presumption of Advancement in Estate Dispute(Jun 2021) Singh v Singh: Resulting Trust, Advancement, and Beneficial Ownership of Property(Nov 2020) Tan & Au LLP v Seo Puay Guan: Contract Duress & Stakeholding Fees Dispute(Mar 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lam Jianhao Mark's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	25%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lam Jianhao Mark's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ranjit Singh v Harisankar Singh: Presumption of Advancement in Estate Dispute 28 Jun 2021 Harisankar Singh (Respondent, Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2021	Harisankar Singh (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for RespondentJudgment in favor of the respondent; awarded $30,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Singh v Singh: Resulting Trust, Advancement, and Beneficial Ownership of Property 09 Nov 2020 Harisankar Singh (Defendant)Won	09 Nov 2020	Harisankar Singh (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found that the Defendant holds the half-share in the Property beneficially.
3	Tan & Au LLP v Seo Puay Guan: Contract Duress & Stakeholding Fees Dispute 06 Mar 2019 Seo Peck Ngo (Respondent)Neutral	06 Mar 2019	Seo Peck Ngo (Respondent): Bound by Settlement AgreementThe court found that Seo Peck Ngo was bound by the settlement agreement and variation deed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Lim Seng Choon David v Global Maritime: Breach of Director's Duties & Oral Contract Dispute 31 Jan 2018 Lim Seng Choon David (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-counterclaim)Lost	31 Jan 2018	Lim Seng Choon David (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-counterclaim): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim based on an alleged oral agreement was dismissed.