Lam Zhen Yu

Lam Zhen Yu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in insolvency law and winding up.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Insolvency Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Moratoria	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Zhen Yu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lam Zhen Yu has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Withers KhattarWong LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Zipmex Pte Ltd v Zipmex Asia Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Creditors’ Meeting Resolutions for Substantive Irregularities(Nov 2024) Tan Huixian v Logistics Construction: Winding Up Application and Judicial Manager's Release from Liability(Nov 2024) Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lam Zhen Yu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.7
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20%
Won	49.2 parties avg	9.2	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	116.0 parties avg	16.0
2024	45.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lam Zhen Yu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Zipmex Pte Ltd v Zipmex Asia Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Creditors’ Meeting Resolutions for Substantive Irregularities 26 Nov 2024 Zipmex Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	26 Nov 2024	Zipmex Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication to set aside the resolutions passed at the Creditors’ Meeting allowed.
2	Tan Huixian v Logistics Construction: Winding Up Application and Judicial Manager's Release from Liability 12 Nov 2024 Ellyn Tan Huixian (Claimant, Applicant)Won	12 Nov 2024	Ellyn Tan Huixian (Claimant, Applicant): Application GrantedApplication for winding up of Logistics Construction Pte Ltd granted; released from liability in respect of any act or omission by her in the judicial management of the Company.
3	Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA 15 May 2024 Shanghai Ran Yu Lian Trading Co Ltd (Other)Lost	15 May 2024	Shanghai Ran Yu Lian Trading Co Ltd (Other): Application OpposedAMT's application was granted despite SRT's opposition.
4	Re Zipmex Co Ltd: Extension of Moratoria under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 10 Jan 2024 Richard Chua Fen Peng (Respondent)Won	10 Jan 2024	Richard Chua Fen Peng (Respondent): Objection upheldObjection to the extension of the moratorium in relation to Zipmex Singapore was upheld.
5	Yap Sze Kam v Yang Kee Logistics: Judicial Management vs. Bondholder Rights 23 Feb 2023 Maybank Singapore Limited (Other)Won	23 Feb 2023	Maybank Singapore Limited (Other): Application DismissedOpposed the JM Applications.