Lau Qiuyu

Lau Qiuyu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lau Qiuyu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lau Qiuyu has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	3 cases	100% of cases	United Overseas Bank v Lippo Marina Collection: Discovery, Litigation & Without Prejudice Privilege(Jun 2017) UOB v Lippo Marina: Discovery & Litigation Privilege in Fraud & Conspiracy Suit(Jan 2017) UOB v Lippo Marina: Attribution of Fraudulent Employee Knowledge & Summary Determination of Law(Feb 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lau Qiuyu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.5 parties avg	6.5	67%
Won	18.0 parties avg	8.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2017	26.5 parties avg	6.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lau Qiuyu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	5,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	United Overseas Bank v Lippo Marina Collection: Discovery, Litigation & Without Prejudice Privilege 14 Jun 2017 United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jun 2017	United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; litigation privilege in the Affidavit subsists and was not waived.
2	UOB v Lippo Marina: Discovery & Litigation Privilege in Fraud & Conspiracy Suit 18 Jan 2017 United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Jan 2017	United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff): Specific discovery of the Affidavit is disallowed.The plaintiff's request for specific discovery of the Affidavit was denied.
3	UOB v Lippo Marina: Attribution of Fraudulent Employee Knowledge & Summary Determination of Law 21 Feb 2016 United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	21 Feb 2016	United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; both applications (determination of law and striking out) granted. Costs of $5,000 awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).