Lauren Tang

Lauren Tang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restructuring and dissolution and judicial management. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lauren Tang has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Group Restructuring	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lauren Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lauren Tang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Virtus Law LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims(Mar 2022) IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lauren Tang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 17.5
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	113.0 parties avg	13.0	50%
Won	119.0 parties avg	19.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2022	113.0 parties avg	13.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lauren Tang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims 13 Mar 2022 Standard Chartered Bank, Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited (Other)Neutral	13 Mar 2022	Standard Chartered Bank, Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited (Other): NeutralStandard Chartered Bank, Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited were on watching brief. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement 26 Nov 2018 IMSPL Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	26 Nov 2018	IMSPL Pte Ltd (Applicant): Moratorium Relief GrantedMoratorium relief granted to IMSPL Pte Ltd.