Lavinia Rajah

Lavinia Rajah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and injunctions. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated expertise across 46 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Deed Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resealing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedial Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Distribution of assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Titles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Title	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Petition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunction to Restrain Winding-Up Petition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lavinia Rajah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lavinia Rajah has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	5 cases	83% of cases	Tan Hup Thye v Refco: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Bonus Entitlements Dispute(May 2010) Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Variation & Escrow Sum Dispute(Jun 2009) Metalform Asia v Ser Kim Koi: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Warranties(Aug 2008)
Tan Rajah and Cheah	1 cases	17% of cases	Tan Chwee Chye v P V RM Kulandayan Chettiar: Adverse Possession Claim Between Co-Owners(Oct 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lavinia Rajah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.8 parties avg	3.8	67%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lavinia Rajah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Hup Thye v Refco: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Bonus Entitlements Dispute 10 May 2010 Tan Hup Thye (Plaintiff)Lost	10 May 2010	Tan Hup Thye (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for bonus entitlements was dismissed.
2	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Variation & Escrow Sum Dispute 30 Jun 2009 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	30 Jun 2009	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application DismissedHolland Leedon's application to vary the injunction was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Metalform Asia v Ser Kim Koi: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Warranties 12 Aug 2008 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Aug 2008	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to strike out portions of the statement of claim was dismissed with costs.
4	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Winding-Up Petition & Bona Fide Cross-Claim Dispute 12 Feb 2007 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	12 Feb 2007	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs below and on appeal to follow the event, and the usual consequential orders. The court found that Metalform Asia had a genuine cross-claim based on substantial grounds and that the filing of a winding-up petition would likely cause irreparable harm to Metalform Asia's business and reputation. The court also found that Holland Leedon had not shown any special circumstances why the court should not restrain them from presenting a winding-up petition against Metalform Asia. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Injunction Against Winding-Up Petition for Breach of Warranty 04 May 2006 Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	04 May 2006	Metalform Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for an injunction to restrain the defendant from presenting a winding-up petition was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Tan Chwee Chye v P V RM Kulandayan Chettiar: Adverse Possession Claim Between Co-Owners 25 Oct 2005 Ng Chek Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Oct 2005	Ng Chek Seng (Plaintiff): Order of Court dated 10 July 2002 is set asideOrder of Court dated 10 July 2002 is set aside with costs to the applicant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.