Lawrence Ang

Lawrence Ang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lawrence Ang has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Murder	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Theft	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Investment Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lawrence Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lawrence Ang has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutors	2 cases	33% of cases	PP v Took Leng How: Murder, Diminished Responsibility & Schizophrenia(Aug 2005) PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver(Nov 2001)
Principal Senior State Counsel	2 cases	33% of cases	PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death(Jul 2005) Public Prosecutor v Louis Pius Gilbert: Referral of Question of Law on Sentencing to Court of Appeal(Feb 2003)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	17% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Teo Cheng Kiat: Criminal Breach of Trust by SIA Employee(Jul 2000)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	1 cases	17% of cases	Wan Kamil v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld for Taxi Driver Killing; Common Intention & Duress Examined(Mar 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lawrence Ang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	62.8 parties avg	2.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lawrence Ang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	6(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Took Leng How: Murder, Diminished Responsibility & Schizophrenia 25 Aug 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Aug 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty as charged.
2	PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death 14 Jul 2005 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	14 Jul 2005	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondents were convicted of murder.
3	Public Prosecutor v Louis Pius Gilbert: Referral of Question of Law on Sentencing to Court of Appeal 20 Feb 2003 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Won	20 Feb 2003	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Motion allowedThe Public Prosecutor's motion to refer a question of law to the Court of Appeal was allowed.
4	Wan Kamil v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld for Taxi Driver Killing; Common Intention & Duress Examined 06 Mar 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Mar 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeals of the second and third appellants were dismissed, upholding the original conviction.
5	PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver 27 Nov 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Nov 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll three accused persons were found guilty as charged.
6	Public Prosecutor v Teo Cheng Kiat: Criminal Breach of Trust by SIA Employee 05 Jul 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Jul 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to imprisonment.