Lawrence Quahe

Lawrence Quahe is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in jurisdiction and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 58.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Invoice Discounting	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Payment Undertaking	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conclusive Evidence Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unauthorised Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Court Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Role of court assessors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lawrence Quahe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lawrence Quahe has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	11 cases	92% of cases	Pinkroccade v. P.T. HM Sampoerna: Mistaken Payment & Constructive Trust in Winding Up(Aug 2002) Virgin Mobile v Virgin Store: Interim Mareva Injunction for Breach of Contract Dispute(Aug 2002) Ng Giok Oh v Sajjad Akhtar: Pre-Action Discovery & Court Assessors' Role in Valuation Dispute(Jul 2002)
Lawrence Quahe & Woo LLC	1 cases	8% of cases	Jiang Ou v EFG Bank AG: Employee Fraud, Unauthorized Trading, and Conclusive Evidence Clauses(Jun 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lawrence Quahe's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	72.1 parties avg	2.1	58%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	62.2 parties avg	2.2
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lawrence Quahe's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(33%)	33%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	7(58%)	58%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	120,972.00	20,162.006 cases	6
USD	2,338,278.68	2,338,278.681 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	6 33	Lost: 3 cases (50.0%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Jiang Ou v EFG Bank AG: Employee Fraud, Unauthorized Trading, and Conclusive Evidence Clauses 08 Jun 2011 Jiang Ou (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jun 2011	Jiang Ou (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in the sum of US$2,338,278.68 to be paid by EFG Bank to Mdm Jiang; interest at the rate of 5.33 per cent on the judgment sum of US$2,338,278.68 from 15 December 2009 till the date of judgment; and costs on a standard basis to be paid by EFG Bank to Mdm Jiang to be taxed if not agreed and such costs shall include the cost of the expert witness.
2	Pinkroccade v. P.T. HM Sampoerna: Mistaken Payment & Constructive Trust in Winding Up 20 Aug 2002 P.T. HM Sampoerna TBK (Applicant)Won	20 Aug 2002	P.T. HM Sampoerna TBK (Applicant): Application grantedSanction was given to the liquidators to make payment of AUD112,472.00 to the claimant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	Virgin Mobile v Virgin Store: Interim Mareva Injunction for Breach of Contract Dispute 13 Aug 2002 Virgin Store (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Optimatum Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Won	13 Aug 2002	Virgin Store (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Optimatum Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiffs' application for an interim mareva injunction against the defendant was dismissed.
4	Ng Giok Oh v Sajjad Akhtar: Pre-Action Discovery & Court Assessors' Role in Valuation Dispute 30 Jul 2002 Philip Leow (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2002	Philip Leow (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for pre-action discovery was dismissed; costs of $8,000 awarded against the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lemon Grass v Peranakan Place: Dispute over Right of Access in Tenancy Agreement 23 May 2002 Peranakan Place Complex Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	23 May 2002	Peranakan Place Complex Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe Defendants' Counterclaim was dismissed with costs to the Plaintiffs.
6	Bayerische Landesbank v Kong Kok Keong: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction in Loan Contract Dispute 18 Mar 2002 Kong Kok Keong (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	18 Mar 2002	Kong Kok Keong (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Lim Boon Ming v Tiang Choo Yang: Probate of Will, Presumption of Destruction Animo Revocandi 14 Mar 2002 Tiang Choo Yang (Defendant)Lost	14 Mar 2002	Tiang Choo Yang (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedThe Defendant's Counterclaim for grant of letters of administration was dismissed.
8	PT Garuda Indonesia v Birgen Air: Setting Aside Order for Service Out of Jurisdiction in Arbitration Dispute 10 Sep 2001 P.T. Garuda Indonesia (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Sep 2001	P.T. Garuda Indonesia (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for leave to serve out of jurisdiction was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Law Society of Singapore v Devadas Naidu: Solicitor's Breach of Professional Conduct Rules in Prohibited Borrowing Transaction 09 Jan 2001 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	09 Jan 2001	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Order accordinglyThe Law Society's application to show cause was successful.
10	Societe Generale v Statoil: Construction of Contract Terms & Right of Recourse 09 Nov 2000 Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 Nov 2000	Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Tan Soan Lian v Edwin Lee Yong Chuan: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce 14 Jun 2000 Edwin Lee Yong Chuan (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	14 Jun 2000	Edwin Lee Yong Chuan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partHusband's appeal to reduce maintenance for the wife and rescind the order for costs was dismissed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
12	Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific: Payment Confirmation & Invoice Discounting Dispute 19 Apr 2000 Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2000	Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.