Lee Chay Pin Victor

Lee Chay Pin Victor is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and criminal law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and assault.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Chay Pin Victor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Chay Pin Victor has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chambers Law LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	EA Apartments Pte Ltd v Tan Bek: Misrepresentation & Breach of Duty in Tenancy Agreement(Nov 2016) Tech-System Design v WYWY Investments: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Calls(Mar 2014) Tan Peng Mong v Public Prosecutor: Taxi Driver Assault, Penal Code Sections 323 & 352(Oct 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Chay Pin Victor's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Won	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Chay Pin Victor's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	EA Apartments Pte Ltd v Tan Bek: Misrepresentation & Breach of Duty in Tenancy Agreement 30 Nov 2016 Chambers Law LLP (Defendant)Won	30 Nov 2016	Chambers Law LLP (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendants of $7,500 in respect of the appeal, $6,000 in respect of the summons to amend the SOC, and a further $3,500 in respect of the hearing of further arguments. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tech-System Design v WYWY Investments: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Calls 30 Mar 2014 Tech-System Design & Contract (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2014	Tech-System Design & Contract (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for an injunction to restrain the defendant from calling on the performance bonds was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tan Peng Mong v Public Prosecutor: Taxi Driver Assault, Penal Code Sections 323 & 352 30 Oct 2013 Tan Peng Mong (Appellant)Lost	30 Oct 2013	Tan Peng Mong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe accused's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.