Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony

Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and copyrights. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated expertise across 67 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ultra vires	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee LLP	14 cases	70% of cases	Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd v Fox Networks Group Singapore Pte Ltd: Copyright Infringement & Standing to Sue(Oct 2021) Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital Management: Fiduciary Duties & Investment Agreement Dispute(Aug 2021) Toh Eng Tiah v Angelina Jiang: Gifts, Inter Vivos, Contract Law, and Sham Agreements(Mar 2021)
Bih Li & Lee	5 cases	25% of cases	Teo Chong Nghee Patrick v Han Cheng Fong: Dispute Over Joint Venture & Wrongful Removal(May 2014) Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Fiduciary Duty & Rebates(Dec 2010) Ng Koo Kay Benedict v Zim Integrated: Defamation Claim over Press Release(Feb 2010)
Bih Li and Lee	1 cases	5% of cases	The Polo/Lauren Co, LP v Shop In Department Store Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement & Likelihood of Confusion(Sep 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 5 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	27.3 parties avg	7.3	10%
Lost	63.6 parties avg	3.6	30%
Partial	43.8 parties avg	3.8	20%
Won	96.4 parties avg	6.4	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	38.4 parties avg	8.4
2014	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2015	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	42.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Hwee Khiam Anthony's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(10%)	10%
Lost	6(29%)	29%
Partial	4(19%)	19%
Won	9(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,744,074.83	449,604.9915 cases	15

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2021	4 121	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd v Fox Networks Group Singapore Pte Ltd: Copyright Infringement & Standing to Sue 25 Oct 2021 Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	25 Oct 2021	Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claims for primary infringement are dismissed under O 14 r 12 of the Rules of Court because the plaintiff lacks standing. As regards the claim for authorisation liability, the court strikes this out under O 18 r 19(1)(b) of the Rules of Court because there is no primary infringement by the Distributors in Singapore for authorisation liability to attach to.
2	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital Management: Fiduciary Duties & Investment Agreement Dispute 23 Aug 2021 Tonny Permana (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	23 Aug 2021	Tonny Permana (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Respondents fixed at $36,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Toh Eng Tiah v Angelina Jiang: Gifts, Inter Vivos, Contract Law, and Sham Agreements 04 Mar 2021 Toh Eng Tiah (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	04 Mar 2021	Toh Eng Tiah (Appellant, Plaintiff): Partial LossOrdered to pay $45,000 to Angelina Jiang after setting off sums owed. The court found the Loan Facilities Agreement to be a sham.
4	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital: Agent's Duties & Investment Advice 15 Feb 2021 Tonny Permana (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Feb 2021	Tonny Permana (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims dismissed with costs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Vaz Lorrain v. Singapore Rifle Assn: Breach of Mediation Agreement & Offer to Settle 19 Nov 2020 Michael Vaz Lorrain (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Nov 2020	Michael Vaz Lorrain (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The Judge’s award of $8,100 in damages is set aside and nominal damages of $1,000 is awarded to SRA. Mr Vaz is entitled to the Post-OTS Costs on an indemnity basis to the extent set out at [82] above. Unless the parties are able to come to an agreement within 14 days of the date of this judgment, we remit the issue of the quantum of the Post-OTS Costs to the Judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	COMPASS v SingNet: Copyright Tribunal's Power to Grant Retrospective Orders 12 Oct 2020 Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (Applicant)Lost	12 Oct 2020	Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (Applicant): LostThe court answered the question in the negative, against the applicant's submission.
7	Michael Vaz Lorrain v Singapore Rifle Association: Offer to Settle & Discontinuance After Judgment 19 Jul 2020 Michael Vaz Lorrain (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Jul 2020	Michael Vaz Lorrain (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowedThe court held that SRA's acceptance of the OTS on 5 May 2020 was not valid.
8	Toh Eng Tiah v Angelina Jiang: Gift vs Loan Dispute in Romantic Relationship 31 Mar 2020 Toh Eng Tiah (Plaintiff)Partial	31 Mar 2020	Toh Eng Tiah (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim allowed for $200,000, $250,000 and $872,000. Entitlement to $250,000 and $872,000 must follow the terms of the $2m Loan Agreement. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Singapore Rifle Association v Singapore Shooting Association: Breach of Contract, Indemnity Clauses, Conspiracy 23 Jan 2019 Chen Sam Seong Patrick (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2019	Chen Sam Seong Patrick (Defendant): Damages to be paidMr Vaz, Mr Yap and Mr Chen are to pay SRA damages in the amount equivalent to the legal fees and disbursements incurred by SRA in investigating and responding to the conspiracy, such fees and disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Singapore Rifle Association v Singapore Shooting Association: Negligence and Occupiers' Liability 22 Jul 2018 The Singapore Shooting Association (Respondent)Won	22 Jul 2018	The Singapore Shooting Association (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; SRA ordered to pay SSA the costs of this appeal fixed at $30,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Singapore Shooting Association v. Singapore Rifle Association: Negligence and Occupier's Liability in Flooding Incident 29 Oct 2017 Singapore Shooting Association (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	29 Oct 2017	Singapore Shooting Association (Plaintiff, Respondent): Claim dismissed in partThe SRA’s claim in respect of the 1st Flood is dismissed.
12	UTOC Engineering v ASK Singapore: Assessment of Damages for Defective Refractory Works 18 Oct 2017 ASK Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	18 Oct 2017	ASK Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Damages assessed against DefendantDamages assessed against the Defendant in the amount of $5,024,732.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	UTOC Engineering Pte Ltd v ASK Singapore Pte Ltd: Application for Stay of Assessment of Damages 15 Aug 2016 ASK Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	15 Aug 2016	ASK Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to appeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $3,000 to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Lim Kok Wah v Lim Boh Yong: Minority Oppression & Control of Siem Seng Hing & Kenson 12 Aug 2015 LIM KOK LEONG (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	12 Aug 2015	LIM KOK LEONG (Defendant, Plaintiff): Judgment for DefendantMinority oppression claim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Teo Chong Nghee Patrick v Han Cheng Fong: Dispute Over Joint Venture & Wrongful Removal 22 May 2014 Han Cheng Fong (Respondent)Partial	22 May 2014	Han Cheng Fong (Respondent): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part regarding the enforceability of the 1 March document.
16	Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Fiduciary Duty & Rebates 01 Dec 2010 Ng Koo Kay Benedict (Respondent)Won	01 Dec 2010	Ng Koo Kay Benedict (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Ng Koo Kay Benedict v Zim Integrated: Defamation Claim over Press Release 08 Feb 2010 Rajathurai Suppiah (Plaintiff)Won	08 Feb 2010	Rajathurai Suppiah (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Contract Claims 10 Jan 2010 Starship Carriers Agencies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	10 Jan 2010	Starship Carriers Agencies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantPlaintiffs' claims against the defendant dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Teo Chin Kiang Willie v MAE Engineering Ltd: Unlawful Termination, Breach of Contract, Director's Duties, and Negligence Claims 28 Jun 2006 Teo Chin Kiang Willie (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2006	Teo Chin Kiang Willie (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $243,341.98 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	The Polo/Lauren Co, LP v Shop In Department Store Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement & Likelihood of Confusion 22 Sep 2005 Shop-In Department Store Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Sep 2005	Shop-In Department Store Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.