Lee Jing Yan

Lee Jing Yan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory offence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Release of seized properties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Jing Yan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Jing Yan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	67% of cases	Masui v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Sentencing, and Prevention of Corruption Act(Dec 2020) AB Partners Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision and Release of Seized Properties(Feb 2020)
Lee & Lee	1 cases	33% of cases	Wibowo Boediono v Cristian Priwisata Yacob: Fraud, Misrepresentation, and Solicitors' Negligence(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Jing Yan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.2
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Partial	25.7 parties avg	5.7	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Jing Yan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Masui v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Sentencing, and Prevention of Corruption Act 01 Dec 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	01 Dec 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossAppeal against sentence allowed in part. Sentence adjusted.
2	AB Partners Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision and Release of Seized Properties 02 Feb 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Feb 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Order sustainedThe order allowing the CAD to retain the seized funds for the purposes of investigations was sustained.
3	Wibowo Boediono v Cristian Priwisata Yacob: Fraud, Misrepresentation, and Solicitors' Negligence 08 Jul 2018 Nila Susilawaty (Respondent)Neutral	08 Jul 2018	Nila Susilawaty (Respondent): NeutralNo specific outcome listed for this party.