Lee Junting Basil

Lee Junting Basil is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in conflict of laws and riddick principle. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranty of Authority	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Licensing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Standing to Sue	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Junting Basil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Junting Basil has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	6 cases	100% of cases	Baizanis v Snap Innovations: Agency, Implied Authority, Tortious Liability, Breach of Contract, Evidence Admissibility(Aug 2024) Tiger Pictures v Encore Films: Copyright Infringement & Exclusive Licensing Dispute(Sep 2023) Allianz Capital Partners GmbH v Goh Andress: Extended Fiona Trust Principle & Jurisdiction Clauses(May 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Junting Basil's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	18.0 parties avg	8.0	17%
Won	32.8 parties avg	2.8	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Junting Basil's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Baizanis v Snap Innovations: Agency, Implied Authority, Tortious Liability, Breach of Contract, Evidence Admissibility 01 Aug 2024 Snap Innovations Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	01 Aug 2024	Snap Innovations Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tiger Pictures v Encore Films: Copyright Infringement & Exclusive Licensing Dispute 10 Sep 2023 Encore Films Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Sep 2023	Encore Films Pte Ltd (Defendant): Striking out application dismissedThe defendant's application to strike out the claim was dismissed.
3	Allianz Capital Partners GmbH v Goh Andress: Extended Fiona Trust Principle & Jurisdiction Clauses 07 May 2023 Allianz Capital Partners GmbH, Singapore Branch (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	07 May 2023	Allianz Capital Partners GmbH, Singapore Branch (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the Judge’s order below in HC/OS 1215/2021 granting a stay of the proceedings. Costs awarded to the Appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Allianz Capital Partners GmbH v Goh Andress: Forum Non Conveniens & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause 25 Oct 2022 Allianz Capital Partners GmbH, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Oct 2022	Allianz Capital Partners GmbH, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; stay of proceedings granted in favor of the defendant.
5	Amber Pharmacy v Lim: Riddick Principle, Document Discovery & Criminal Investigations 17 Nov 2019 Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Nov 2019	Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Implied undertaking modified to permit disclosure of documents revealing potential commission of Employment of Foreign Manpower Act offencesImplied undertaking modified to permit disclosure of documents revealing potential commission of Employment of Foreign Manpower Act offences. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ong Boon Hwee v Cheah Ng Soo: Joint Tenancy, Writs of Seizure and Sale, and Civil Procedure 11 Mar 2019 Phoey Kaw Moi (Respondent)Won	11 Mar 2019	Phoey Kaw Moi (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court found in favour of the respondent, Phoey Kaw Moi.