Lee Kai Lin Kelyn

Lee Kai Lin Kelyn is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and trust law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Unlawful trusts	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Kai Lin Kelyn has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	1 cases	100% of cases	Lim Kieuh Huat v Lim Teck Leng: HDB Flat Ownership Dispute Involving Resulting and Constructive Trusts(Aug 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Kai Lin Kelyn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Kai Lin Kelyn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Kieuh Huat v Lim Teck Leng: HDB Flat Ownership Dispute Involving Resulting and Constructive Trusts 31 Aug 2020 Zhang Honghong (Defendant)Won	31 Aug 2020	Zhang Honghong (Defendant): Judgment forJudgment for the defendant. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).