Lee Kiat Seng

Lee Kiat Seng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and winding up. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and asset recovery.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Kiat Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Kiat Seng has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Bidvest v Deacons: Escrow Agreement Dispute over US$4 Million Payout(Apr 2010) ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore(Dec 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Kiat Seng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Kiat Seng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bidvest v Deacons: Escrow Agreement Dispute over US$4 Million Payout 26 Apr 2010 Bidvest Australia Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2010	Bidvest Australia Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedBidvest's claim that Deacons wrongly paid out the Escrow Sum was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore 11 Dec 2008 Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (Respondent)Neutral	11 Dec 2008	Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (Respondent): NeutralSupporting creditor