Lee Leann

Lee Leann is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Leann has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and maintenance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Variation of Consent Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Access Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parent-Child Relationship	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Variation of Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Visitation Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Leann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Leann has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	WAY v WAZ: Variation of Access Orders Appeal in Singapore Family Court(Jun 2022) VOD v VOC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute(Feb 2022) VOC v VOD: Stay of Execution Application in Divorce Proceedings(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Leann's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Leann's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	585,289.98	146,322.504 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WAY v WAZ: Variation of Access Orders Appeal in Singapore Family Court 08 Jun 2022 WAY (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	08 Jun 2022	WAY (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Mother's appeal against the variation of the Access Orders was dismissed. No order as to costs.
2	VOD v VOC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 17 Feb 2022 VOD (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	17 Feb 2022	VOD (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partThe Judge’s decision on the division of matrimonial assets and on maintenance is varied to the extent stated above and the respective appeals of the parties are allowed to that extent. The remaining aspects of their appeals are dismissed. The husband is to pay the wife a sum of S$585,289.98 within one month from the date of our decision if he has not already done so. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	VOC v VOD: Stay of Execution Application in Divorce Proceedings 03 Jun 2021 VOD (Defendant)Lost	03 Jun 2021	VOD (Defendant): Stay of execution deniedThe husband's application for a stay of execution of orders was dismissed.
4	AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance after Divorce 22 Nov 2012 AYM (Appellant)Partial	22 Nov 2012	AYM (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal against the refusal to vary the terms of division of matrimonial assets was dismissed. Appeal against the order of a lump sum maintenance of $750,000 to be paid to the Wife out of the Husband’s share of the sale proceeds was allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.