Lee Ming Hui Kelvin

Lee Ming Hui Kelvin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated expertise across 96 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantification of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Further Arguments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal moneylending	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unilateral Offer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Assignment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defence of payment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Operational Losses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Ming Hui Kelvin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 19 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WNLEX LLC	19 cases	95% of cases	Medora Xerxes Jamshid v Planar One: Provable Debt & Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Bankruptcy(Jul 2024) Foo Kian Beng v OP3 International: Director's Duties, Dividends, and Insolvency Law(Mar 2024) DDM v DDL: Division of Matrimonial Assets & CPF in Divorce(Oct 2023)
Assomull and Partners	1 cases	5% of cases	ABC Supermarket v Kosma Holdings: Claim for Operational Losses Due to Defective Air-Conditioning(Feb 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Ming Hui Kelvin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 4 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	5%
Lost	63.6 parties avg	3.6	30%
Partial	62.2 parties avg	2.2	30%
Unknown	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Won	72.9 parties avg	2.9	35%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2021	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2022	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2023	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Ming Hui Kelvin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	6(29%)	29%
Partial	6(29%)	29%
Unknown	1(5%)	5%
Won	7(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	22,099,934.82	1,473,328.9915 cases	15
USD	388,281.22	388,281.221 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	4 121	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Medora Xerxes Jamshid v Planar One: Provable Debt & Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Bankruptcy 30 Jul 2024 Planar One & Associates Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Non-party)	30 Jul 2024	Planar One & Associates Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Non-party): -
2	Foo Kian Beng v OP3 International: Director's Duties, Dividends, and Insolvency Law 26 Mar 2024 OP3 International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2024	OP3 International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; Foo Kian Beng remains liable for $1,182,394. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
3	DDM v DDL: Division of Matrimonial Assets & CPF in Divorce 02 Oct 2023 DDM (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Oct 2023	DDM (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentThe Wife was awarded 49.5% of the matrimonial assets, totaling S$4,395,426.49.
4	CSW v CSX: Appeal Dismissed in Contempt of Court Case over Child Access 27 Jun 2023 CSX (Respondent)Won	27 Jun 2023	CSX (Respondent): Appeal DismissedCosts of $20,000 plus disbursements of $1,500 for the committal proceedings awarded to the Husband (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	TG Master Pte Ltd v Tung Kee Development: Jurisdiction for Further Arguments After Trial & Penalty Rule 19 Mar 2023 TG Master Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	19 Mar 2023	TG Master Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Decision in the Judgment affirmedThe court affirmed its original decision, finding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear further arguments after a trial.
6	VOW v VOV: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 02 Mar 2023 VOW (Appellant)Partial	02 Mar 2023	VOW (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part, orders varied.
7	TG Master Pte Ltd v Tung Kee: Contractual Terms, Penalties, and Land Sale Dispute 18 Dec 2022 TG Master Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	18 Dec 2022	TG Master Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim for Extension Fees DismissedClaim for Extension Fees of $863,147 dismissed.
8	OP3 International Pte Ltd v Foo Kian Beng: Director's Duties & Creditor Interests 14 Sep 2022 OP3 International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Sep 2022	OP3 International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment against the defendant for $1,182,394, reflecting losses caused by breaches of duty. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Metupalle Vasanthan v Loganathan Ravishankar: Contract Formation, Assignment, and Waiver Dispute 19 Apr 2022 Laszlo Karoly Kadar (Appellant)Lost	19 Apr 2022	Laszlo Karoly Kadar (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Vasanthan v Ravishankar: Skantek Debt, Contract Formation & Moneylending 21 Oct 2021 Laszlo Karoly Kadar (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Dismissed	21 Oct 2021	Laszlo Karoly Kadar (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed.
11	Ho Soo Fong v Ho Pak Kim Realty: Application for Leave to Appeal Stay of Execution 06 Sep 2021 Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	06 Sep 2021	Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts of the application fixed at $4,000 inclusive of disbursements to be paid by the applicants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd v Ho Soo Fong: Directors' Duties & Breach 14 Sep 2020 Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	14 Sep 2020	Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $3,590,587 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	IPP Financial Advisers v Saimee: Negligent Misrepresentation, Limitation & Vicarious Liability 12 May 2020 Quek Miaw Sian Alice (Appellant)Won	12 May 2020	Quek Miaw Sian Alice (Appellant): Appeal AllowedSaimee’s claims against the appellants are time-barred and must therefore fail.
14	UZR v UZS: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child & Wife Maintenance in Long Marriage Divorce 18 Dec 2019 UZR (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Dec 2019	UZR (Plaintiff): PartialMatrimonial assets distributed in the proportions of 47:53 between the Husband and the Wife, with the Husband to transfer S$4,049,758.75 to the Wife within six months from the date of this judgment. Parties to share the costs of her university expenses. No maintenance is ordered for the Wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	BYX v BYY: Sale of Mortgaged Property Under Writ of Seizure and Sale 06 Oct 2019 BYX (Plaintiff)Won	06 Oct 2019	BYX (Plaintiff): Order granted for sale of propertyOrder granted for the Sheriff to proceed with the sale of the Property without the consent of the mortgagee bank to satisfy the judgment debt of $4,109,474.76 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Solomon Alliance Management v Pang Chee Kuan: Breach of Contract & Defamation 17 Jun 2018 Solomon Alliance Management Pte Ltd (formerly known as Solomon Asset Management Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	17 Jun 2018	Solomon Alliance Management Pte Ltd (formerly known as Solomon Asset Management Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim AllowedJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed at a later hearing. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Liu Tsu Kun v Tan Eu Jin: Conspiracy & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Autostyle & VDPL Investments 28 Sep 2017 Tan Eu Jin (Defendant)Lost	28 Sep 2017	Tan Eu Jin (Defendant): Claim allowed in partFound liable for conspiracy in relation to both Autostyle and VDPL investments.
18	BNS v BNT: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife & Child Maintenance, and Child Custody Dispute 26 Feb 2017 BNS (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Feb 2017	BNS (Plaintiff): PartialReceived S$513,440.61 from the DBS Bank Account No. xxxxxxx84-20 and care and control of the children. Maintenance of S$2,000 per month for 2 years.
19	Lim Andy v Tea Yeok Kian Terence: Loan Agreement Dispute & Defence of Payment 06 Apr 2015 Tea Yeok Kian Terence (Defendant)Lost	06 Apr 2015	Tea Yeok Kian Terence (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's claim was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	ABC Supermarket v Kosma Holdings: Claim for Operational Losses Due to Defective Air-Conditioning 27 Feb 2005 ABC Supermarket Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	27 Feb 2005	ABC Supermarket Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, damages increased to $54,623.50, including rectification costs and compensation for additional losses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.