Lee Mun Hooi

Lee Mun Hooi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and bills of exchange law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated expertise across 78 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Detention	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gambling Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
User Principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bona Fide Purchaser	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Titles Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compensation for delays	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compensation Principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Industry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking Out Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Detention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Sum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hire	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Friendly Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Default Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Acquisition Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nominee Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gaming contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Renovation Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Mun Hooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Mun Hooi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee Mun Hooi & Co	14 cases	70% of cases	Sin Herh Construction v Hyundai Engineering: Interim Injunction & Performance Bond Call Dispute(Jan 2017) ACES System Development v Yenty Lily: Wrongful Termination & Platform Detention(Oct 2013) Yenty Lily v ACES System: Breach of Contract, Wrongful Detention & Damages Assessment(Oct 2012)
Lee Mun Hooi and Co	6 cases	30% of cases	Henny Sutanto v Chandra Suwandi: Cheque Presentation & Bills of Exchange Act(Sep 2005) TR Networks v Elixir Health: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Guarantee & Indemnity Claims(May 2005) Henny Sutanto v Suriani Tani: Unlicensed Moneylending & Cheque Liability Dispute(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Mun Hooi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 4 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	103.2 parties avg	3.2	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Partial	45.4 parties avg	5.4	20%
Won	63.0 parties avg	3.0	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2005	45.7 parties avg	5.7
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	22.8 parties avg	2.8
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Mun Hooi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(48%)	48%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	4(19%)	19%
Won	6(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,247,522.90	89,108.7814 cases	14
USD	160,125.52	160,125.521 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sin Herh Construction v Hyundai Engineering: Interim Injunction & Performance Bond Call Dispute 08 Jan 2017 Sin Herh Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Jan 2017	Sin Herh Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for an interim injunction and Erinford Order was dismissed.
2	ACES System Development v Yenty Lily: Wrongful Termination & Platform Detention 03 Oct 2013 Yenty Lily (trading as Access International Services) (Respondent)Won	03 Oct 2013	Yenty Lily (trading as Access International Services) (Respondent): Appeal upheld in the High CourtDamages awarded for wrongful detention of platforms. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Yenty Lily v ACES System: Breach of Contract, Wrongful Detention & Damages Assessment 17 Oct 2012 Yenty Lily (trading as Access International Services) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	17 Oct 2012	Yenty Lily (trading as Access International Services) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; figures awarded by the Assistant Registrar are set aside and replaced with new awards.
4	Taka Jewellery Pte Ltd v Tan Choon Sim: Fraud Claim and Employee Theft Dispute 13 Aug 2012 Tan Choon Sim (Defendant)Won	13 Aug 2012	Tan Choon Sim (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed.
5	Ang Kim Sai v Ang Kok Beng: Dispute over Beneficial Ownership of Property 27 Dec 2010 Ang Kok Beng (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	27 Dec 2010	Ang Kok Beng (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal against the decision to strike out parts of his defence was dismissed. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	BM Building v Chua Thiam Siew: Libel Claim for Poor Workmanship Allegations 21 Dec 2010 BM Building Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Dec 2010	BM Building Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for libel was dismissed with costs to be paid to the defendant.
7	Tan Kah Hock v Chou Li Chen: Application for Satisfaction of Final Judgment 22 Nov 2009 Tan Kah Hong (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Nov 2009	Tan Kah Hong (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiffs' application to hold the judgment sum in trust was dismissed.
8	Tan Kah Hock v Chou Li Chen: Specific Performance & Breach of Shareholders' Agreement Dispute 02 Jun 2008 Tan Kah Hong (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	02 Jun 2008	Tan Kah Hong (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and the order below was set aside.
9	United States Trading Co Pte Ltd v Ting Boon Aun: Partnership Liability for Partner's Fraud 29 Jan 2008 Ting Boon Kiat (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	29 Jan 2008	Ting Boon Kiat (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part. The defendant is given leave to defend the remaining sum of US$160,125.52.
10	Erect Scaffolding Pte Ltd v Hor Kew Pte Ltd: Damages for Conversion and Lost Scaffolding 23 Sep 2007 Erect Scaffolding Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	23 Sep 2007	Erect Scaffolding Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; damages awarded for conversion ($331,500) and lost items ($148,111) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Henny Sutanto v Chandra Suwandi: Cheque Presentation & Bills of Exchange Act 20 Sep 2005 Henny Sutanto (Appellant)Lost	20 Sep 2005	Henny Sutanto (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
12	TR Networks v Elixir Health: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Guarantee & Indemnity Claims 30 May 2005 TR Networks Inc (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	30 May 2005	TR Networks Inc (Plaintiff, Appellant): Assistant registrar’s order variedAssistant registrar’s order varied by adding the condition that the fifth defendant provide security for the sums claimed, either by way of banker’s guarantee or in such other form as may be agreed between the parties, within 21 days and that in default thereof, the plaintiffs be at liberty to enter judgment against him for the said sums. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Henny Sutanto v Suriani Tani: Unlicensed Moneylending & Cheque Liability Dispute 25 Apr 2005 Henny Sutanto (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Apr 2005	Henny Sutanto (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the second defendant was dismissed with costs. The default judgment against the first defendant was set aside as irregular. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Soon Li Heng v Woon Contractors: Sub-contractor's Claim Dispute over Earthworks Payment 17 Feb 2005 Woon Contractors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Feb 2005	Woon Contractors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim of $537,681.25 was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Fraser Securities v Seet Ai Kiang: Summary Judgment & Parol Evidence Rule 14 Jan 2004 Seet Ai Kiang (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	14 Jan 2004	Seet Ai Kiang (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; summary judgment stands against the defendant for $578,911.90 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Sutanto Henny v Suriani Tani: Striking Out Claim for Cheque Payment 13 Jan 2004 Sutanto Henny (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	13 Jan 2004	Sutanto Henny (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe plaintiff's appeal against the decision to strike out her claim was allowed.
17	Sutjiawang Johanis v Tjia Eng Soei: Claim for Monies Lent and Shares 29 Apr 2002 Sutjiawang Johanis alias Tjia Eng Liong (Plaintiff)Won	29 Apr 2002	Sutjiawang Johanis alias Tjia Eng Liong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for US$750,000, $4,069,000, and the return of shares or their value. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Liwen Holdings v Ng Ker San: Adverse Possession & Land Title Dispute 15 Apr 2001 Ng Ker San (Defendant, Applicant)Neutral	15 Apr 2001	Ng Ker San (Defendant, Applicant): Order accordinglyCourt ordered a trial of the factual issue of whether adverse possession was acquired by 1 March 1994. The court held that if adverse possession has crystallized before 1 March 1994, the owners of 1 and 3 Bedok Rise have become the owners of the disputed plot and their rights and interests over the said plot cannot be overreached by the events thereafter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Lam Seng Hang Co Pte Ltd v The Insurance Corporation of Singapore Ltd: Marine Insurance Claim Dispute 15 Feb 2001 Lam Seng Hang Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	15 Feb 2001	Lam Seng Hang Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to appeal to the High Court was dismissed.
20	Quek Chiau Beng v Phua Swee Pah Jimmy: Recovery of Gambling Debt & Illegality of Gaming Contracts 23 Nov 2000 Quek Chiau Beng (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	23 Nov 2000	Quek Chiau Beng (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the plaintiff is required to pay the defendant's costs for the appeal to the district judge and the High Court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.