Lee Pei Hua Rachel

Lee Pei Hua Rachel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in private international law and recognition of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated expertise across 48 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Family Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Muller Exception	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non approbation and reprobation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Pei Hua Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Pei Hua Rachel has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	6 cases	75% of cases	Luckin Coffee Inc v Interactive Digital Finance Ltd: Jurisdiction & Service Out of Singapore(Mar 2024) Goh Tze Chien v Tan Teow Chee: Validity of Company Winding Up Resolution & Mental Capacity(Jan 2024) Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Interlocutory Injunction for Minority Oppression(Dec 2023)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Paulus Tannos v Heince Tombak Simanjuntak: Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcy Orders & Natural Justice(Aug 2020)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Pei Hua Rachel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.2
Complex Cases: 6 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	47.0 parties avg	7.0	50%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	13%
Won	35.0 parties avg	5.0	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2023	45.8 parties avg	5.8
2024	33.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Pei Hua Rachel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	600.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Aug 2024 Star Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	18 Aug 2024	Star Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedStar Engineering's appeal against the stay of proceedings in favor of arbitration was dismissed.
2	Luckin Coffee Inc v Interactive Digital Finance Ltd: Jurisdiction & Service Out of Singapore 04 Mar 2024 Tiah Thee Kian (Respondent)Won	04 Mar 2024	Tiah Thee Kian (Respondent): Application for permission to appeal dismissedLuckin's application for permission to appeal against the decision of the Judge in RA 206 was dismissed. The court ordered Luckin to pay the costs of the application fixed at $7,000, inclusive of disbursements, to the Claimants collectively, and also to Credit Suisse AG individually. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Goh Tze Chien v Tan Teow Chee: Validity of Company Winding Up Resolution & Mental Capacity 08 Jan 2024 Tan Teow Chee (Respondent)Won	08 Jan 2024	Tan Teow Chee (Respondent): Judgment in favor of RespondentSummons No 2196 of 2023 dismissed; costs to Mr Tan fixed at $3,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Interlocutory Injunction for Minority Oppression 28 Dec 2023 Leong Quee Ching Karen (Claimant, Respondent)Lost	28 Dec 2023	Leong Quee Ching Karen (Claimant, Respondent): Application dismissedThe claimant's application for interim injunctions was dismissed. No monetary amount was specified. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lim Soon Huat v Lim Teong Huat: Deed of Family Arrangement & Conversion of Originating Application 21 Dec 2023 Leong Quee Ching Karen (Defendant)Won	21 Dec 2023	Leong Quee Ching Karen (Defendant): Conversion AllowedConversion of originating application to originating claim allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Without Prejudice Privilege & Minority Oppression 22 Aug 2023 Leong Quee Ching Karen (Claimant)Partial	22 Aug 2023	Leong Quee Ching Karen (Claimant): Application allowed in partClaimant's application to strike out emails allowed in part; emails ordered to be expunged from affidavits, except for one email.
7	Interactive Digital Finance Ltd v Credit Suisse AG: Production of Documents under Rules of Court 2021 23 Jul 2023 Tiah Thee Kian (Claimant, Appellant)Lost	23 Jul 2023	Tiah Thee Kian (Claimant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the AR's order for production of documents was dismissed. Claimants to bear their own costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Paulus Tannos v Heince Tombak Simanjuntak: Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcy Orders & Natural Justice 26 Aug 2020 Maria Margaretha Jusuf (Respondent)Lost	26 Aug 2020	Maria Margaretha Jusuf (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the recognition of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Orders was set aside.