Lee Peng Khoon Edwin

Lee Peng Khoon Edwin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction industry security of payment act. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 10% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	13 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	11 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles Board	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Invalid service of payment claim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent errors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Severance of adjudication determination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Claims by subcontractor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determinations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Leases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Options to purchase	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housing Developers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Peng Khoon Edwin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 19 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	19 cases	95% of cases	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA & Fraud in Construction Contract Dispute(Sep 2024) TG Master v Tung Kee: Option to Purchase, Deposits, and Extension Fees Dispute(May 2024) Terrenus Energy v Attika Interior: Construction Delay & Defect Dispute(Nov 2023)
Eldan Law LLC	1 cases	5% of cases	AXA Insurance v Chiu Teng Construction: Performance Bond Dispute over Subcontract Breach at NTU Project(Jun 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Peng Khoon Edwin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 2 (10%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	110.0 parties avg	10.0	5%
Lost	105.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	10%
Remanded	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Won	62.3 parties avg	2.3	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	46.7 parties avg	6.7
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Peng Khoon Edwin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	10(50%)	50%
Partial	2(10%)	10%
Remanded	1(5%)	5%
Won	6(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,418,105.75	368,175.4812 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Remanded: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA & Fraud in Construction Contract Dispute 17 Sep 2024 Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	17 Sep 2024	Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the decision below in respect of the reduction of $155,160. Garnished sum of $23,668.05 to be returned to Builders Hub Pte Ltd. Costs of the appeal fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements. Costs below fixed at $17,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	TG Master v Tung Kee: Option to Purchase, Deposits, and Extension Fees Dispute 01 May 2024 TG Master Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	01 May 2024	TG Master Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedTG Master's appeal was allowed, entitling them to retain the Further Sums and Renovation Costs, and claim unpaid extension fees. The court ordered the Respondents to pay $388,000 in extension fees. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Terrenus Energy v Attika Interior: Construction Delay & Defect Dispute 26 Nov 2023 Attika Interior + MEP Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	26 Nov 2023	Attika Interior + MEP Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim partially allowedCounterclaim partially allowed; balance of contract sum awarded, subject to deductions. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	JP Nelson v Builders Hub: Setting Aside SOPA Adjudication for Fraud and Premature Application 04 Jul 2023 Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 Jul 2023	Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Respondent): Review Adjudicated Amount reducedThe Adjudication Review Amount was reduced by the amount of $155,160, and Builders Hub is ordered to repay JP Nelson the sum of $155,160, being the sum that Builders Hub had unlawfully gained by the fraud. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Chwee Wah v Yow Jia Wen: Collective Sale Dispute over Chuan Park En Bloc 25 May 2023 Long Wee Fong (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2023	Long Wee Fong (Defendant): Objection DismissedObjection to the collective sale dismissed.
6	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA, Termination Clauses & Payment Claims 02 May 2023 Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Claimant)Remanded	02 May 2023	Builders Hub Pte Ltd (Claimant): Adjudication Determination set aside and remittedThe Adjudication Determination was set aside and remitted to the learned Adjudicator for further determination.
7	LJH Construction v. Chan Bee Cheng: Setting Aside Adjudication for Invalid Service, Fraud, and Natural Justice Breach 19 Sep 2022 Gracie Chan Bee Cheng (Defendant)Won	19 Sep 2022	Gracie Chan Bee Cheng (Defendant): WonApplication to set aside the Adjudication Determination granted.
8	Backho (S) Pte Ltd v KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd: SOPA Dispute over Oral Contract and Adjudication Determination 16 Jan 2022 KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	16 Jan 2022	KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application to set aside the Adjudication Determination and the Order is dismissedKSE's application to set aside the Adjudication Determination and the Order is dismissed.
9	BQG v Public Prosecutor: Application for Criminal Reference and Disclosure of Witness Statements 08 Jul 2021 BQG (Applicant)Lost	08 Jul 2021	BQG (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to refer a question of law to the Court of Appeal was summarily dismissed.
10	AXA Insurance v Chiu Teng Construction: Performance Bond Dispute over Subcontract Breach at NTU Project 23 Jun 2021 Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	23 Jun 2021	Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd; AXA liable to pay $397,687.50 plus interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Chiu Teng Construction v AXA Insurance: Performance Bond Dispute 01 Nov 2020 Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	01 Nov 2020	Chiu Teng Construction Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedPlaintiff's application to trigger the defendant's liability under the performance bond was allowed. The defendant is liable to the plaintiff under the Bond in the sum of $397,687.50 plus interests at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the commencement of the present application on 19 June 2020. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Samsung C&T Corp v Soon Li Heng: Performance Bond & Unconscionability under SOPA 16 Aug 2020 Samsung C&T Corporation (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	16 Aug 2020	Samsung C&T Corporation (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedSamsung's appeal was dismissed with costs.
13	Ong Keh Choo v Paul Huntington Bernardo: Contract Law, Consideration & Misrepresentation 15 Jul 2020 Ong Keh Choo (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jul 2020	Ong Keh Choo (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and the original judgment against the appellant was upheld. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
14	Soon Li Heng v Samsung C&T: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call for Alleged Overpayment in Construction Subcontract Dispute 11 Nov 2019 Samsung C&T Corporation (Defendant)Lost	11 Nov 2019	Samsung C&T Corporation (Defendant): Injunction Granted AgainstThe court found the call on the performance bond unconscionable and granted an injunction against Samsung C&T Corporation.
15	Stargood Construction v Shimizu: SOPA, Adjudication, and Termination of Subcontract 05 Nov 2019 Shimizu Corporation (Defendant)Lost	05 Nov 2019	Shimizu Corporation (Defendant): Application DismissedDefendant's arguments were not accepted, and the plaintiff's application was allowed.
16	CMC Ravenna v CGW Construction: Setting Aside Adjudication Review Determination under SOPA 22 Oct 2017 CMC Ravenna Singapore Branch (Applicant)Lost	22 Oct 2017	CMC Ravenna Singapore Branch (Applicant): Application to set aside Review Determination dismissedCGW's application to set aside the Review Determination was dismissed.
17	Audi Construction v Kian Hiap Construction: SOPA, Premature Payment Claims & Waiver 10 Jul 2017 Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	10 Jul 2017	Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): WonSummons to set aside adjudication determination allowed.
18	Citiwall Safety Glass v Mansource Interior: SOPA Adjudication Response Deadline Dispute 19 Aug 2015 Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	19 Aug 2015	Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Fu Loong v Mok: Chairperson's Powers & Subsidiary Proprietors' Rights in Strata Management 22 May 2014 Mok Wai Hoe (Respondent)Partial	22 May 2014	Mok Wai Hoe (Respondent): Appeal Partially UnsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful; rulings on Motions 8 and 9 invalidated; rejection of Contested Votes on Motion 2 invalidated; direction on amendments to Motions 1(b) and 1(e) set aside. Costs to be borne by the 1st Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Fu Loong v Mok: Invalidating MCST Chairperson Rulings on Motions at General Meeting 27 Oct 2013 Mok Wai Hoe (Defendant)Dismissed	27 Oct 2013	Mok Wai Hoe (Defendant): Application dismissed in partThe Plaintiffs’ application to invalidate the 1st Defendant’s ruling on Motions 3(a), 3(b), 8 and 9 are validated; the other orders sought by the Plaintiffs were refused.