Lee Ping

Lee Ping is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and injunctions. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 42% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Ping has demonstrated expertise across 63 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restrictive covenants	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gambling Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stare Decisis	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tort of conspiracy to injure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-solicitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Springboard injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest receipt of stolen property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Ping has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	9 cases	75% of cases	Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA(May 2024) MoneySmart Singapore v Artem Musienko: Enforceability of Restraint of Trade Clauses & Interlocutory Injunctions(Apr 2024) Envy Asset Management v Lau Lee Sheng: Striking Out Pleadings & Amendment Application(Feb 2024)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	2 cases	17% of cases	Jardine Lloyd Thompson v Howden: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty in Employee Defection(Aug 2015) Chua Boon Chye v Public Prosecutor: Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Marine Fuel Oil(Jul 2014)
Shook Lin & Bok	1 cases	8% of cases	Tan Choon Wee v Pine Capital Group: Injunctions, Directors' Removal & Companies Act(Aug 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Ping's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 5 (42%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	78.4 parties avg	8.4	58%
Partial	44.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2019	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	311.5 parties avg	11.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Ping's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(58%)	58%
Partial	4(33%)	33%
Won	1(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,500,000.00	700,000.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mingda Holding Pte Ltd (in liquidation): Liquidator's Authority & Creditor Funding Agreement under IRDA 15 May 2024 Yang Mingdong (Other)Lost	15 May 2024	Yang Mingdong (Other): Application OpposedAMT's application was granted despite Yang Mingdong's opposition.
2	MoneySmart Singapore v Artem Musienko: Enforceability of Restraint of Trade Clauses & Interlocutory Injunctions 01 Apr 2024 MoneySmart Singapore Pte Ltd (Claimant)Lost	01 Apr 2024	MoneySmart Singapore Pte Ltd (Claimant): Interim injunctions dischargedThe court discharged the interim injunctions sought by MoneySmart Singapore Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Envy Asset Management v Lau Lee Sheng: Striking Out Pleadings & Amendment Application 07 Feb 2024 Toh Ai Ling (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	07 Feb 2024	Toh Ai Ling (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by the first and second defendants against the claimants was dismissed.
4	The Star Pty Ltd v Guoxing Cui: Recognition of Foreign Judgment on Gambling Debt 19 Jan 2023 The Star Pty Ltd (Applicant)Lost	19 Jan 2023	The Star Pty Ltd (Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe applicant's appeal was dismissed.
5	Tan Choon Wee v Pine Capital Group: Injunctions, Directors' Removal & Companies Act 29 Aug 2019 Pine Capital Group Limited (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	29 Aug 2019	Pine Capital Group Limited (Defendant, Plaintiff): Orders sought pursuant to ss 182 and 392 of the Companies Act granted in partThe court only granted the orders sought in (b) above (“the second 24 April Order”). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	World Fuel Services v Xie Sheng Guo: Restraint of Trade and Confidentiality in Aviation Oil Supply 04 Mar 2019 World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	04 Mar 2019	World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiff's application to enforce the restraint of trade clause was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Chee Yin Meh v Sim Guan Seng: Discovery of Documents & Constructive Trusts 23 Oct 2018 Chee Yin Meh (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	23 Oct 2018	Chee Yin Meh (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application granted subject to limitationsThe Plaintiff's claim for a beneficial interest is ongoing, but the Defendant's application for discovery was granted with limitations.
8	Nippon Catalyst v PT Trans-Pacific: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act 21 May 2018 Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	21 May 2018	Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision to grant a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration and to set aside the ex parte order granting leave to serve out of jurisdiction was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Sze Siu Hung: Service Out of Jurisdiction and Setting Aside Default Judgment 26 Apr 2018 Sze Siu Hung (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Sze Siu Hung (Defendant, Appellant): Appeals DismissedDefendant's appeals and application to adduce further evidence dismissed.
10	Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Luo Shandong: Summary Judgment and Debt Repayment Dispute 26 Feb 2018 Luo Shandong (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	26 Feb 2018	Luo Shandong (Defendant, Appellant): Conditional leave to defend grantedConditional leave to defend granted, requiring the defendant to pay $3,500,000 into court within 14 days. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Jardine Lloyd Thompson v Howden: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty in Employee Defection 02 Aug 2015 Howden Insurance Brokers (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	02 Aug 2015	Howden Insurance Brokers (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application Dismissed in PartApplication for 'springboard' injunctions dismissed, but injunctions against disclosure of confidential information and solicitation of employees granted against other defendants.
12	Chua Boon Chye v Public Prosecutor: Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Marine Fuel Oil 14 Jul 2014 Chua Boon Chye (Appellant)Lost	14 Jul 2014	Chua Boon Chye (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.