Lee Tat Weng, Daniel

Lee Tat Weng, Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in agency law and settlement agreement. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Purchase Price Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deed of Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied authority of agent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Tat Weng, Daniel has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Fullerton Law Chambers LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Implied Authority and Settlement Agreement Validity(May 2020) Neo Aik Soo v. Neo Geek Kuan: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership Dispute(Nov 2019) Law Chau Loon v Alphire Group: Settlement Agreement & Implied Authority(Nov 2019)
Breakpoint LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Amendment of Defence, Abuse of Process & Riddick Principle(Nov 2024) Ollech David v Horizon Capital Fund: Appeal Against Summary Judgment & Adducing Further Evidence(Mar 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Tat Weng, Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Neutral	110.0 parties avg	10.0	20%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	27.7 parties avg	7.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Tat Weng, Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	27,500.00	5,500.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Amendment of Defence, Abuse of Process & Riddick Principle 25 Nov 2024 Spackman Media Group Limited (Defendant)Neutral	25 Nov 2024	Spackman Media Group Limited (Defendant): NeutralThe sixth defendant had a watching brief. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ollech David v Horizon Capital Fund: Appeal Against Summary Judgment & Adducing Further Evidence 11 Mar 2024 Horizon Capital Fund (Respondent)Won	11 Mar 2024	Horizon Capital Fund (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the judge sitting in the General Division of the High Court to dismiss the appellant’s appeal against the grant of summary judgment in favour of the respondent; and the appellant’s application to adduce further evidence was dismissed. Costs in the sum of $20,000 inclusive of disbursements, and consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Implied Authority and Settlement Agreement Validity 18 May 2020 Law Chau Loon (Respondent)Won	18 May 2020	Law Chau Loon (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Law Chau Loon; Law Chau Loon awarded costs of $25,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Neo Aik Soo v. Neo Geek Kuan: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 28 Nov 2019 Neo Aik Siong (Defendant)Lost	28 Nov 2019	Neo Aik Siong (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Law Chau Loon v Alphire Group: Settlement Agreement & Implied Authority 26 Nov 2019 Law Chau Loon (Applicant)Won	26 Nov 2019	Law Chau Loon (Applicant): Application grantedApplication granted; the court declared that the settlement agreement made on 2 February 2019 was valid and binding on Alphire. Costs of S$7,500 awarded to the applicant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).