Lee Tau Chye

Lee Tau Chye is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and child support. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Land Register	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Severance Payment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Interest	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Severance of Joint Tenancy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Tau Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Tau Chye has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee Brothers	5 cases	100% of cases	COMPASS v Golden Village: Copyright Licence Termination & Misrepresentation(Jan 2021) TAU v TAV: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute in Divorce Proceedings(Mar 2015) Chew Nam Fong Ronny v Continental Chemical Corp: Severance Pay Dispute(Jul 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Tau Chye's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	23.8 parties avg	3.8
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Tau Chye's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	COMPASS v Golden Village: Copyright Licence Termination & Misrepresentation 18 Jan 2021 Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Jan 2021	Composers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentThe court declared that the Licence has been terminated such that 30 June 2017 was the last day on which the Licence was in force; and ordered GV to submit to COMPASS GV’s gross receipts from 1 April 2016 to 30 June 2017 for computation of the licence fee for that period. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	TAU v TAV: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 31 Mar 2015 TAV (Respondent)Won	31 Mar 2015	TAV (Respondent): Orders of District Judge affirmedThe orders of the District Judge were affirmed.
3	Chew Nam Fong Ronny v Continental Chemical Corp: Severance Pay Dispute 07 Jul 2011 Chew Nam Fong Ronny (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Jul 2011	Chew Nam Fong Ronny (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for severance payment and legal fees was dismissed.
4	Lee Hwee Khim Rosalind v Lee Sai Khim: Severance of Joint Tenancy and Beneficial Ownership Dispute 24 Mar 2011 Tan Choon Nghee Melvin (Defendant)Won	24 Mar 2011	Tan Choon Nghee Melvin (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Forefront Medical v Modern-Pak: Contractual Terms & Material Suitability in Clamshell Production 16 Jan 2006 Forefront Medical Technology (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	16 Jan 2006	Forefront Medical Technology (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to be agreed or taxed if not agreed.