Lee Wei Qi

Lee Wei Qi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Polygamous Marriage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landscape Design	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Goods Sold and Delivered	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Services Rendered	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Overpayment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Course of Dealings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Wei Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Wei Qi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Verona Capital v. Ramba Energy: Contract Interpretation & Breach of Warranty(Apr 2016) TIG v TIH: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Polygamous Marriage(Dec 2015) Ng Chong Ping v Ng Chih-Ming Daren: Amendment Application & Costs Allocation in Negligence Claim(Mar 2015)
Tan Peng Chin LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Stone World Sdn Bhd v Engareh (S) Pte Ltd: Dispute over Payment for Marble Fabrication in Marina Bay Sands Project(Jan 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Wei Qi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Wei Qi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,964,460.09	991,115.024 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Verona Capital v. Ramba Energy: Contract Interpretation & Breach of Warranty 03 Apr 2016 RAMBA ENERGY WEST JAMBI LIMITED (Defendant)Won	03 Apr 2016	RAMBA ENERGY WEST JAMBI LIMITED (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	TIG v TIH: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Polygamous Marriage 07 Dec 2015 TIH (Defendant)Lost	07 Dec 2015	TIH (Defendant): Required to transfer assets and pay maintenanceHusband required to transfer 35% of matrimonial assets, amounting to $3,388,312, and pay a lump sum maintenance of $497,285 to the Wife (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ng Chong Ping v Ng Chih-Ming Daren: Amendment Application & Costs Allocation in Negligence Claim 19 Mar 2015 Archideas Design Inc (Fourth Party)Neutral	19 Mar 2015	Archideas Design Inc (Fourth Party): NeutralThe outcome for this party is neutral as the appeal concerned costs allocation.
4	Verona Capital v Ramba Energy: Misrepresentation Claim in Oil & Gas Investment 28 Apr 2014 Ramba Energy West Jambi Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Apr 2014	Ramba Energy West Jambi Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Ramba Energy's appeal for additional security for costs was unsuccessful. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Stone World Sdn Bhd v Engareh (S) Pte Ltd: Dispute over Payment for Marble Fabrication in Marina Bay Sands Project 23 Jan 2013 Engareh (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2013	Engareh (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for $84,453.09 for overpayment was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.