Lee Wei Yuen Arvin

Lee Wei Yuen Arvin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and recourse against award. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranty of Authority	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bank Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bareboat Charter	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Wei Yuen Arvin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wee Swee Teow LLP	6 cases	100% of cases	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Breach of Warranty, Damages, and Interest in Letter of Indemnity Dispute(Jun 2024) Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute(Oct 2023) Hunan Xiangzhong Mining v Oilive: Jurisdiction of Arbitrator Appointed by SIAC President(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Wei Yuen Arvin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.6 parties avg	2.6	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Wei Yuen Arvin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	5,000.003 cases	3
USD	20,639,381.12	10,319,690.562 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Breach of Warranty, Damages, and Interest in Letter of Indemnity Dispute 06 Jun 2024 PPT Energy Trading Co Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	06 Jun 2024	PPT Energy Trading Co Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment againstPPT Energy Trading Co Ltd was found to have breached the warranty of marketable title given in the LOI, such that CACIB was entitled to damages in the amount of US$10,319,910.31.
2	Crédit Agricole v PPT Energy: Letter of Credit, Fraud, & Indemnity Dispute 23 Oct 2023 PPT Energy Trading Co Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	23 Oct 2023	PPT Energy Trading Co Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment againstJudgment against PPT in the sum of $10,319,470.81 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and international trade).
3	Hunan Xiangzhong Mining v Oilive: Jurisdiction of Arbitrator Appointed by SIAC President 27 Feb 2022 Hunan Xiangzhong Mining Group Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2022	Hunan Xiangzhong Mining Group Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for a declaration that the sole arbitrator does not have jurisdiction over the arbitration proceedings was dismissed.
4	CMJ v CML: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice 29 Dec 2021 CMK (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Dec 2021	CMK (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Year Sun v Gunvor: Setting Aside SIAC Award for Gasoil Contract Breach 12 Oct 2021 Year Sun Chemitanks Terminal Corp (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Oct 2021	Year Sun Chemitanks Terminal Corp (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed with costs of S$15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	BW Umuroa Pte Ltd v Tamarind Resources Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 05 Apr 2020 Tamarind Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	05 Apr 2020	Tamarind Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding up order madeWinding up order made against the defendant. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).