Lee Wen Rong Gabriel

Lee Wen Rong Gabriel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of damage	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Meetings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Domain Name Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Cybersquatting	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Wen Rong Gabriel has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Selvam LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Affle Global Pte Ltd v OSLabs Pte Ltd: Validity of Resolutions for Share Purchase(Mar 2022) Apex Energy v Wanxiang Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages for Light Cycle Oil(Jul 2020) 3 Corporate Services v Grabtaxi: Domain Name Dispute & Cybersquatting(Jan 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Wen Rong Gabriel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Wen Rong Gabriel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	5,000.002 cases	2
USD	1,211,778.60	1,211,778.601 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Affle Global Pte Ltd v OSLabs Pte Ltd: Validity of Resolutions for Share Purchase 24 Mar 2022 PhonePe Private Limited (Defendant)Won	24 Mar 2022	PhonePe Private Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of PhonePe. Costs fixed at $20,000 plus disbursements to be borne equally by OSLabs and PhonePe for OS 468, and costs fixed at $10,000 plus respective disbursements to be paid by Affle for OS 800. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Apex Energy v Wanxiang Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages for Light Cycle Oil 05 Jul 2020 Apex Energy International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	05 Jul 2020	Apex Energy International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $1,211,778.60 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves international oil trading and the damages are calculated in USD).
3	3 Corporate Services v Grabtaxi: Domain Name Dispute & Cybersquatting 21 Jan 2020 3 Corporate Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jan 2020	3 Corporate Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.